story, or anything of the kind in my presence I will
order your committal for contempt."
From these anecdotes one would infer that he was a very
severe, and stern Judge—unpopular with the Bar, and the people. Such
however was not the case, as we know from tradition, from the press of the
day and from addresses presented to him. On the contrary he was
universally esteemed, and beloved by all who came in contact with him. His
standard of life was high, and occupying the high position he did, he
deemed it his duty to impress upon all those who came under his influence
the same spirit and rule of conduct.
I have tried to get other anecdotes of incidents
happening on trials before Judge Bliss, but without success, as those who
could have related them are all gone. The few I have given were
characteristic, and help us to form some idea of his methods in conducting
trials which took place in the Courts before him.
The record of the judicial career of Judge Bliss is
principally to be found in the Nova Scotia Law Reports. Notices of trials
in which he was engaged occasionally appears in the press of the day, but
hardly full enough to convey any correct idea of the manner in which he
dealt with the case before him. It appears from one of these notices that
he first took his seat on the Bench after his appointment in a criminal
trial with the Chief Justice, and Judge Wilkins in May, 1834.
There were no Court reporters at that time, nor for
some years after his elevation, so that with some few exceptions we know
little of his early decisions between 1834
and 1853. About the latter date, the late James
Thompson, a barrister of the Court, gathered some of the Judgments of the
Supreme Court given in past years, and published them in a volume now
known as No. i Supreme
Court Reports. Amongst these are several from Mr. Justice Bliss, and from
that time onward until he resigned his judgments are included in all the
reports terminating in the second volume of Oldright. In a brief |