a general education in addition to his purely legal
studies. The law began with customs and usages of the
people. These developing became fixed and permanent in
the common law. Later, as new conditions arose and the
old law was found inadequate to meet the need that the
new situation produced, the equity jurisdiction and its
doctrines were added to meet these new demands. Thus the
law has continued to develop. These advances do not
precede, but rather follow the social conditions that
make them necessary. The law student then must have
sufficient general knowledge of affairs to recognize and
grasp these propositions and controversies, while they
are yet in a formative state, to meet and master them
with the application of known principles where adaptable,
and form new ones if the old ones will no longer meet and
fully carry out the purposes of the people.
This does not alone
apply to him who acts in the professional capacity of a
lawyer. It is true that the lawyer must have a knowledge
of the law, and should have an ideal looking beyond the
mere rules of the law; but the following of these
principles, having in mind the application of the
fundamental purposes underlying them, is involved in the
conduct of every person when he comes to deal with the
questions arising out of his relations with his fellows.
Whether he be laborer in the street, minister in the
pulpit, legislator in the state house, banker trusted
with the funds of the community, or whatever be the means
through which he reaches and influences others, a
knowledge of these things is of direct practical value.
They are the things that reach into, affecting and
controlling the relations of life and the conduct of the
people in their affairs.
The value of a legal
education then to the possessor, and to the public, will
depend, in direct proportion, upon his knowledge of sound
principles of law; his knowledge of the claims of
society, and his recognition of and submission to them.
His usefulness to society, as one possessing a knowledge
of the law, will be his ability to look beyond principles
of law and recognize in himself a "minister of justice"
capable of living and growing with the growth of that
great ideal. The student of the law who works with such
an ideal will truly serve.
ROBERT G. SIMMONS.
HERE
doesn't seem to be any serious question but that the
people of the state and the students of the University of
Nebraska would like each other better if they saw each
other oftener. Association is a great thing. In the
number and value of its accomplishments it is more than a
companion for solitude, which usually breaks out in some
somber poem or freak invention. Association has been
directly responsible for some of the most rich and
powerful industrial combinations in the world, and it
also preceeds a vast number of happy marriages. Why
association, with its great effectiveness both in the
material and sentimental world, should not have been
earlier employed as a means of promoting confidence
between tax payers and students, does not readily
appear.
Contact of a certain
kind is the virtue that extension week in the state hopes
to apply. Some people out in the state don't seem to
realize how hard the students work at their activities --
music, dramatics, debate, and the like. Extension week
will give the people an opportunity to watch us work. The
chance to travel around and appear before audiences will
also be a great incentive to the aspiring amateur in the
various arts which the student learns. It is a field for
the practical application of some things that the
students learn in their regular curriculum. It is hard to
see any good objection on principle to extension week in
the state and the Cornhusker seems to be the best place
for the students to give it their everlasting
endorsement.