OFFICERS FOR 1897.
PRESIDENT--A. S. VON MANSFELDE |
Ashland |
||||
VICE PRESIDENT--E. H. BARBOUR |
Lincoln |
||||
SECRETARY-TREASURER--G. D. SWEZEY |
Lincoln |
||||
CUSTODIAN--LAWRENCE BRUNER |
Lincoln |
||||
{ |
H. B. DUNCANSON |
Peru |
|||
DIRECTORS- |
C. J. ELMORE |
Crete |
|||
H. HAPEMAN |
Minden |
||||
H. B. WARD |
Lincoln |
||||
{ |
DIRECTORS, ex-officiis. |
||||
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE- |
E. T. HARTLEY |
Lincoln |
|||
C. E. BESSEY |
Lincoln |
||||
{ |
H. B. WARD |
Lincoln |
|||
EDITORIAL COMMITTEE- |
E. H. BARBOUR |
Lincoln |
|||
C. E. BESSEY |
Lincoln |
MEMBERS.
(Names of Charter Menders are Starred.)
Edward John Angle, B.S., M.D., Lincoln--Zoology.
Carrie Adeline Barbour, Lincoln; Assistant Curator, State Museum--Palaeontology.
Erwin Hinckley Barbour, A. B., Ph. D., Lincoln; Professor of Geology in the University of Nebraska, Acting State Geologist, and Curator State Museum--Geology.
Harris Millar Benedict, B. S., A. M., Instructor in Natural Science in the High School, Lincoln--Zoology.
Charles Edwin Bessey, B. S., Ph. D., Lincoln; Professor of Botany in the University of Nebraska and Acting State Botanist--Botany.
Ernst Athearn Bessey, Lincoln--Botany.
*Rosa Houton, B. S., A.M., Lincoln; Instructor in Chemistry in the University of Nebraska--Chemistry.
Robert J. Boyd ---
H. Brownell, B. S., Peru; Professor of Chemistry and Physics in the Nebraska State Normal School--Chemistry.
216 |
|
|
217 |
MINUTES OF THE SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA, LINCOLN,December 29,1896.
The seventh annual meeting of the Nebraska
Academy of Sciences was called to order at 2 P.
M. in room 15, Nebraska Hall. In the absence of the
president the vice president, H. B. Duncanson, presided.
In accordance with the provision in the
constitution, the chair appointed as a nominating committee C. E.
Bessey, H. Brownell, and E. M. Hussong.
The report of the secretary, including the
minutes of the last annual meeting was read, together with the
report of the custodian, and the following recommendations of the
executive committee were submitted:
First--The appointment of a committee, to
consist of the executive committee together with two other members
of the Academy, to consider and act in the matter of having the
proceedings published by the state.
Second--That the following by-laws be proposed
at the annual meeting for adoption by the Academy:
1. Volumes of the proceedings of the
Academy shall be sent only to members whose dues are paid.
2. Papers may be read before the
Academy by members only, except on order of the executive
committee.
3. In order to be published in the
proceedings, papers must be in the hands of the secretary within
thirty days from the date of reading.
220 |
|
4. All titles of papers to
be read at the annual meeting must be in the hands of the
secretary two weeks before the annual meeting.
Third--That the following amendments to the
constitution be proposed and recommended:
Amendment to article 3, section 3: Instead of
"two directors," to read "four directors."
Amendment to article 4, section 1: "The annual
meeting shall be held in the city of Lincoln, on the afternoon and
evening of the day before Charter day, and on Charter day unless
otherwise ordered by the executive committee."
It was further recommended that the treasurer be
authorized to sell back numbers of publications III. and IV.
together for 25 cents, and that the price of 50 cents be placed on
the last issue; that the secretary be authorized to secure other
publications in exchange for those of the Academy, and that the
library of the University of Nebraska be officially designated as
depository for the exchanges and library of the Academy.
The report of the secretary, the minutes of the
last meeting, and the general recommendations of the executive
committee were adopted by successive motions, as were also the
amendments to the by-laws as proposed by the executive committee,
together with the first amendment to the constitution, changing
the number of directors from two to four.
The proposed change in the date of the annual
meeting was discussed at some length. An informal vote showed ten
members and visitors in favor of the present date, eleven in favor
of Charter day, and twelve in favor of a date about Thanksgiving
time. Voted that for next year the annual meeting be held on the
Friday and Saturday following Thanksgiving day.
The treasurer's report was referred, without
being read, to an auditing committee to be appointed.
The annual address by the retiring president, E.
H. Barbour, who had been unexpectedly called to Washington to read
a paper before the Geological Society of America, was by
permission of the academy read by H. B. Ward for the author. The
|
221 |
subject of the address was "Academies of Science: Their
Economic and Educational Value."
Two connected papers, "Continued Biological
Observations," by Henry B. Ward, and "A New Plankton Pump," by
Henry B. Ward and Charles Fordyce, were then read. Following these
came a short "Report of Progress in the Study of the Fauna of the
State," by Laurence Bruner:
"This state is exceedingly rich in forms of
life. I can call to your attention a few examples of this. Our
birds in Nebraska number 416 species, as against 364 species for
Kansas. I have found in the state 280 to 290 species of
grasshoppers. In the study of our butterflies we have ascertained
that upwards of 125 distinct forms occur in the state of Nebraska,
and each year we add new forms to these. In the collection of
tiger beetles in this state we succeeded in bringing together 40
different forms. In like manner, in the study of our wild bees,
during the last two years we have gathered about 300 distinct
species, collecting only during three months in the year at two
places in the state. Nebraska is well adapted for these forms, as
well as plants. I have been surprised that there is so little done
in the collection of different forms. If we eliminate species
after species, we would eliminate more titles than species--150 to
200 titles would include all that has been written on the animal
life in this state. We have in the state something like 40 species
of worms collected. In Arkansas there are something like 30
species recorded. We have of insects about 7,000 species, in the
collection of the university. The spiders, etc., which have been
collected show that our fauna is very rich in these forms also. We
have in the university a collection which numbers about 150
species, and 15 or 20 have been counted as not known. When we come
down to the crustacea, there has been little done. Of fishes we
know a little through the work carried out by the state fish
commission. But we undoubtedly have a larger number of fishes that
the fish commission knows nothing about. I re-
222 |
|
member of taking from 50 to 60 species from the Elkhorn
river alone. Again, the reptiles of Nebraska are quite numerous.
We have a paper by Taylor on the snakes of the state, but aside
from this I know of no record of the reptiles. The birds have been
pretty thoroughly studied, as we have working in the state about
twenty-five good observers. The notes of most of these were
brought together before the State Horticultural Society last year,
and since then no additional forms have occurred, so the list is
about completed. As to mammals, we know practically nothing in
this state. In the early days we know that the buffalo, the
antelope, two species of deer, the gray wolf, the brown bear,
foxes, and panthers used to be found here. Thus far, then, we see
that there has been little done in the way of studying the animal
life of the state. The botanists have made a fair beginning in the
study of the plants of the state, but the animals are much more
numerous than the plants. I might say, in conclusion, that the
reasons for a larger fauna in the state are these: Nebraska is
located midway between the north and south; the Southeastern
corner of the state is barely 800 feet above the sea level, while
the western part is almost 6,000. We have two large water courses
and the variation of the surface is great. Therefore the variation
in the animal life must be great. The time will come when a number
of the forms that are now living in the state will be extinct, due
to various changes brought about by civilization."
"The Nomenclature of Nebraska Forest Trees" was
the title of a paper by C. E. Bessey, and "Reflections on the
Genus Ribes" were presented by F. W. Card. Papers on
"Chalcedony-Lime Nuts from the Bad Lands of Nebraska," by E. H.
Barbour, "A Comparison Between Nebraska Diatomaceous Earth with
that from Neighboring States," by C. J. Elmore, "What is
Mathematics?" by Ellery W. Davis, and "A Family of Quartic
Surfaces," by R. E. Moritz, were read and discussed.
The nominating committee reported the following
list of officers for the coming year, and by vote the Secretary
was instructed to cast the ballot of the Academy for the same:
|
223 |
President, A. S. von Mansfelde,
Ashland; vice president, E. H. Barbour, Lincoln;
secretary-treasurer, G. D. Swezey, Lincoln; custodian, Laurence
Bruner, Lincoln; directors, H. B. Ward, Lincoln, H. B. Duncanson,
Peru, C. J. Elmore, Crete, H. Hapeman, Minden.
On motion the Academy then adjourned until 8
P. M.
December 29, 1896, 8 P.
M.
In the absence of the president and vice
president, the meeting was called to order by the secretary and L.
Bruner was elected chairman pro tem.
Voted that the directors of the Academy be an
auditing committee to examine the books of the treasurer.
Voted that the committee to arrange for the
publication of the proceedings by the state be the new executive
committee, with two others chosen by the president. A. S. v.
Mansfelde* and E. T. Hartley were appointed on this committee.
A paper on "Some Methods of Collecting,
Preserving, and Mounting Fossils,' by Carrie A. Barbour, was read
and then commented upon by C. E. Bessey as follows: "I want to
express my gratification on this address. I have not heard of it
myself, before. The one thing that it seems to me all this teaches
us is that apparently destroyed remains may be preserved if we
know how to take care of the material. It calls to my mind a
number of cases a year ago. I found bones, tusks, etc., which I
thought were entirely too decayed for use at all. The one thing
that we must see that the people of the state know is that even a
most thoroughly decayed specimen of a bone, if it is covered over
and kept from the air until some expert can come and dig it out,
may turn out to be of scientific value. These things can be saved
long after a point where they seem to be beyond redemption."
A paper entitled "An Observation Upon Annual
Rings in Tree Growth" was then read by Fred W. Card and discussed
as follows by C. E. Bessey: "I should like to see this repeated a
num-
224 |
|
her of times. I doubt whether we get any other results. I
was a surveyor many years ago in a wooded country. Now in a wooded
country, when a line is run from one section to another, they
'blaze' the line. When they come to the quarter posts they have
what they call 'witness' trees. Now it happens that these
'witness' trees many times stand twenty-five and forty years, and
over and over again it occurs that these 'blazes' are overgrown
and we never found that the account was mis-written. For the
government survey was thirty-two years before our survey, and when
we cut in we could count just thirty-two rings from that time. I
do think that a tree may form occasionally a second ring. Governor
Furnas has a number of trees of which he knows the date when he
set them out, and he finds that sometimes they have more rings
than they should have. On the plains here I do not see why a tree,
being isolated, might not go into the summer rest and start again
in the fall. But in the forests this cannot occur, so I doubt
whether a second ring ever happens in a great forest, because the
ground is moist all the time. So I take it that if we make
experiments here long enough, we could get a second ring. Again,
if you go into the south far enough you will not find rest with
the growth. There are blocks of wood in some of the cases here on
which you cannot make out any line where one growth begins and
another stops."
R. A. Emerson read a paper on the "Internal
Temperature of Trees," which was discussed as follows:
The importance of this may be shown in regard to
orchard trees. Trees sometimes get sick on the southwest side;
this is called "sun-scald." The tree usually dies. There is a
belief among horticulturists that a rapid change in the winter
affects the vitality of the bark. There is a great deal of injury
done to trees in this way.
Professor Condra: "Did you perform any
experiments in regard to the growth of trees?"
Mr. Emerson: "I think it would be hard to obtain
such results. Results have been obtained, however, in regard to
this, and have been published."
|
225 |
Dr. Bessey: "We have no means of
accurately obtaining these results. We do not know yet of any way
by which we can tell the temperature of the cambium layer. When we
bore a hole in a tree and destroy the layer of cells and have an
air cavity in there instead of the solid mass of wood, we put in
at once a condition which brings about an error. It is to be hoped
that the electricians will give us an instrument by which we can
measure the temperature of leaves without destroying them. We have
no thermometer small enough to really determine the temperature of
the limb accurately. All this, while it tells us something, is
telling it to us about as crudely as the illustration I have
suggested. We must have some thermometer of an entirely different
kind. Something which will not make it necessary to break the
tissue at all. I am quite strongly of the opinion that when we
learn how hot the cambium layer becomes, we will find it gets very
hot in the Summer."
Professor Swezey: "I think it is possible to get
such an electrical device."
Owing to the lateness of the hour, the following
papers were read by title only: "The Barites of Nebraska and the
Bad Lands," by E. H. Barbour; "Some Data as to Wind Distribution
of Seeds," by E. M. Hussong; "Parasites of Nebraska Dogs and
Cats," by H. B. Ward; "The Study of Botany in the School for the
Blind," by C. E. Bessey; "Discovery of Meteoric Iron in Nebraska,"
by E. H. Barbour; "Notes on the Phyllopoda of Nebraska," by H. A.
Lafler and A. S. Pearse.
The Academy then adjourned.
G. D. SWEZEY,
Secretary.
G. D. Swezey, treasurer, in account with the Nebraska Academy of Sciences: 1896.
Jan. 1, Balance from last year |
$5 64 |
|
Received dues for 1895 |
3 00 |
|
Received dues for 1896 |
31 00 |
|
Feb. 1, Paid for printing programs and circulars |
$8 75 |
|
April 16, Paid for cuts for transactions |
1 25 |
|
April 16, Paid for exchange |
03 |
|
October 23, Paid for rubber stamp |
30 |
|
December 1, Paid for postage |
2 10 |
|
Balance on hand |
|
27 21 |
$39 64 |
$39 64 |
Approved:
H. B. DUNCANSON,
C. J. ELMORE,
H. HAPEMAN,
HENRY B.
WARD,
Directors.
|
227 |
At a meeting of the publication
committee of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, December 14, 1897,
the following rules were adopted:
I. All papers intended for publication must be
in the hands of the publication committee, ready for printing,
within thirty days after official notice has been sent to the
authors.
II. No corrections will be allowed after a paper
is set up, save at the expense of the author. To avoid the
necessity of correction, as far as may be possible, the committee
earnestly recommends that all manuscript be prepared with the
utmost care, and, if possible, type-written.
III. All necessary drawings must accompany the
manuscript and must be made in India ink.
IV. Illustrations used in the Proceedings will
ordinarily be zinc etchings. Only in rare cases, and then by a
special vote of the editorial committee, will photographs be
reproduced as halftone engravings.
V. When the request is made on the manuscript,
an author will be furnished, gratis, twenty unbound copies of his
paper. Additional unbound copies will be furnished at cost if so
requested on manuscript.
VI. Papers read before the Academy, but printed
elsewhere, will regularly be noticed in the Proceedings, but may
be abstracted, and only very exceptionally printed in full.
VII. Papers read before the Academy, but not in
condition for publication, shall be presented as notes or
preliminary reports.
ELLERY W.
DAVIS,
Secretary of the Committee.
NOTE.--In accordance with the decision of the editorial committee papers are grouped according to subjects into botanical, geological, mathematical, and zoological; and under each topic are arranged alphabetically according to authors, except in the cue of those papers so closely connected in subject-matter as to necessitate another order. All papers included in the program of the last meeting of the Academy are printed here so far as they have been received from the authors, and have not been published elsewhere.
FOREST TREES.
CHARLES E. BESSEY.
The many changes in the nomenclature of the forest trees of Nebraska make it necessary that an authentic list should be given in which the names now generally accepted take the place of those which have become antiquated. I find that of the sixty-seven trees admitted to the following list no less than twenty-six have suffered some changes in nomenclature.
CLASS GYMNOSPERMAE.
ORDER CONIFERAE. Family Pinaceae.
1. Pinus ponderosa Douglas, in Lawson's Manual, 354 (1836). The citation of Loudon as the authority for this species is an error. Douglas's name was used in Companion of the Botanical Magazine in 1836, and in Lawson's Agriculturist's Manual of the same year, but (Sudworth says) he did not describe it. Loudon described it (in Arboretum et Fructicetum Britannicum, vol. IV., crediting the name to Douglas, as appears to have been done also, in Lawson's Manual. Our tree is what Engelmann separated as the variety scopulorum in the Botany of California, vol. II., p. 126 (1880). It is
230 |
|
doubtful whether this is entitled to varietal rank, since our trees are but little different from those on the Pacific coast, which are regarded as typical. If this variety is to be deemed valid our tree will then be named P. ponderosa scopulorum Engelmann, otherwise it will be P. ponderosa Douglas.
2. Juniperus virginiana L. Sp. Pl. 1039 (1753).
ORDER THALAMIFLORAE. SUB-ORDER RANALES.
Family Anonaceae.
3. Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal, Monographic de la. Famille des Anonacées, 83 (1817). This was named Anona triloba by Linne, in the first edition of his Species Plantarum, 537, but since Donal's work there has been no doubt as to its proper name.
4. Salix nigra Marshall, Arbustum
Americanum, 139 (1785).
5. Salix amygdaloides Andersson,
Ofversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps Akademiens Forhandlingar (1858).
This tree was originally confused with S. nigra, from which
it was separated by Andersson in 1858.
6. Salix lucida Muehlenberg, Neue
Schriften der Gesellsehaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin, IV.
1803).
7. Salix fluviatilis Nuttal, Sylva of
North America (1842). This has hitherto borne the name of S.
longifolia Muehlenberg, Neue Schrift. Gessel. Nat. Fr. Berlin
(1803), and was so named in my previous lists, but, as Professor
Sargent points out in Garden and Forest, vol. VIII., November
(1895), Muehlenberg's name is not available, having been used in
1778 by Lamarck in his Flora Francais, vol 2, 232. The name S.
longifolia is still used in Gray's and Coulter's Manuals.
8. Salix bebbiana Sargent, Garden and
Forest VIII., November (1895). This has hitherto, borne the name
of S. rostrata Rich-
|
231 |
ardson in the appendix to Franklin's Narrative of a
Journey from the Shores of Hudson Bay and the Polar Sea, 753
(1823), and was so named in my previous lists, but, as Professor
Sargent pointed out in Garden and Forest, cited above, this name
had already been used by Thuillier in his Flore des Environs de
Paris in 1799. In consequence it became necessary for Professor
Sargent to give it a new name, as above. This still bears the name
of S. rostrata in Gray's and Coulter's Manuals.
9. Salix cordata Muehlenberg, Neue
Schrift. Gesel. Nat. Fr. Berlin (1803). The tree here referred to
is the one to which the common name of Diamond Willow has been
applied. For some years it was supposed that the variety
vestita of Andersson was this tree; and it was so named in
my previous lists, but that has been determined by Sargent to be
an error. For the present we can do no more than call it a form of
this species. In the Illustrated Flora (Britton and Brown) our
plant appears to be confused with S. missouriensis
Bebb.
10. Populus tremuloides Michaux, Flora
Boreali-Americana, 11 (1803).
11. Populus balsamifera L. Sp. Pl. 1034
(1753). In previous lists this has been given as the variety
candicans of Gray (more properly of (Aiton) Gray), or
canadensis (Moench) Sudworth, but I am confident now that
our tree is the species proper and not the variety.
12. Populus augustifolia James, Long's
Expedition, 1, 497 (1823).
13. Populus acuminata Rydberg, Bulletin
of the Torrey Botanical Club, 20:50 (1893), This interesting tree
is conceded by Professor Sargent as "probably a distinct species."
(Sylva, IN., 172.)
14. Populus deltoidea Marshall, Arbusium
Americanum, 106 (1785). This has borne the name of P.
monilifera Aiton in previous lists and in Gray's Manual. in
Coulter's Manual it is P. angulata Alton, while in De
Candolle's Prodromus
232 |
|
XVI., 2 (1868), it is P. canadensis Moench. In the Illustrated Flora a variation of the spelling is used, as P. deltoides.
15. Tilia americana L. Sp. Pl. 514 (1753).
16. Ulmus americana L. Sp. Pl. 226
(1753).
17. Ulmus racemosa Thomas, American
Journal of Science, 19:170 (1831).
18. Ulmus fulva Michaux, Flora
Boreali-Americana, 1:172 (1803). In some recent lists this bears
the name U. pubescens Walter, Flom Caroliniana (1788), and
there is reason to believe that this may be the prior name.
19. Celtis occidentalis L. Sp. Pl. 1044
(1753).
20. Morus rubra L. Sp. Pl. 986
(1753).
Family Oleaceae.
21. Fraxinus americana L. Sp. Pl. 1057
(1753).
22. Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall,
Arbustum Americanum, 51 (1785). This is the F. pubescens
Lamarck (1786), which name it bears in Gray's and Coulter's
Manuals.
23. Fraxinus pennsylvanica lanceolata
(Borkh.) Sargent, Silva of North America, VI., 50 (1804). This
was first named P. lanceolata by Borkhausen (Handbook
Forst. Bot., 1800). It received the name of P. viridis by
Michaux filius in Histoire des Arbres, in 1813, and the latter
name has been very generally adopted by American botanists, and is
still used in Gray's and Coulter's Manuals.
Family Rosaceae.
24. Pirus coronaria ioensis Wood,
Class-book, 333 (1870) This is the P. iowensis (Wood)
Bailey of the "Check List."
25. Crataegus tomentosa L. Sp. Pl. 476
(1753).
|
233 |
26. Crataegus mollis (Torrey &
Gray) Scheele, Linnaea 21:569 (1848). This is the C. coccinea
mollis T. & G. of the sixth edition of Gray's Manual, and
the C. subvillosa Schrader of some lists.
27. Crataegus coccinea L. Sp. Pl. 476
(1753).
28. Crataegus coccinea macracantha
(Lodd.) Dudley, Bulletin of Cornell University, 2:33 (1886). In
the "Check List" this is considered to be a distinct species under
Loddige's original name C. macracantha.
29. Amelanchier canadensis (L.) Medicus,
Geschichte der Botanikunserer Zeiten, 79 (1793).
30. Prunus virginiana L. Sp. Pl. 473
(1753).
31. Prunus serotina Ehrhart, Beitraege
zur Naturkunde, 3:20 (1788).
32. Prunus americana Marshall, Arbustum
Americanum, 111 (1785).
33. Gymnocladus dioicus (L.) Koch,
Dendrologie, 1:5 (1869). This is G. canadensis Lamarck
(1783), and of the ordinary manuals. It was first named
Guilandina dioica by Linne in Sp. Pl. 381 (1753).
34. Gleditsia triacanthos L. Sp. Pl. 1056
(1753). In nearly all publications the generic name is given as
Gleditschia in spite of the fact that Linne Spelled
Gleditsia, evidently from Gleditsius, Latinized from the
German Gleditsch.
35. Cercis canadensis L. Sp. Pl. 374
(1753).
36. Platanus occidentalis L. Sp. Pl. 999 (1753).
37. Rhamnus lanceolata Pursh, Flora
Americae Septentrionalis, 166 (1814).
38. Rhamnus caroliniana Walter, Flora
Caroliniana, 101 (1788). 16
234 |
|
39. Lepargyraea argentea (Pursh) Greene, Pittonia 2:122 (1890). This small tree was first named Elaeagnus argentea by Nuttall in Fraser's Catalogue in 1-813; but this being a name only, with no description whatever, it cannot be considered valid. In 1814 Pursh in his Flora Americae Septentrionalls, 1:115, described it as Hippophae argentea, giving no credit whatever to Nuttall for the specific name. In 1817 Rafinesque, in the American Monthly Magazine, separated it and erected the genus Lepargyraea, and about a year later Nuttall independently erected the genus Shepherdia (Genera of North American Plants, 2:240, 1818). Nuttall's name was generally accepted and is still used in Gray's and Coulter's Manuals.
40. Aesculus glabra Willdenow,
Enumeratio Plantarum Horti Regii Botanici Berolinensis, 405
(1809).
41. Acer glabrum Torrey, Annals of the
Lyceum of New York, 2:172 (1826).
42. Acer saccharinum L. Sp. Pl. 1055
(1753). This tree is commonly given the name A. dasycarpum
Ehrhart, Beitraege zur Naturkunde, 4:24 (1789), but the name given
by Linne certainly belongs to this tree, since the specimens in
his herbarium with this name attached, as well as the original
description, agree fully with our tree, Dr. Gray long ago (1839),
in a letter to Dr. Torrey (Letters of Asa Gray, 1:150), called his
attention to the fact that Linne referred to the tree subsequently
described by Michaux (Flor. Bor.-Am., 2:253, 1803) as A.
criocarpum, which is identical with Ehrhart's A.
dasycarpum. For some reason, not now regarded as valid, no
effort was made to restore this name, and so we find that in all
the editions of Gray's Manual, down to the present, the error has
been permitted to stand.
43. Acer barbatum Michaux, Flora
Boreali-Americana, 0-:252 (1803). There has been much confusion as
to the names of
|
235 |
this and the preceding species. It appears that this tree
was not separated from the preceding species for half a century
after Linne had bestowed the name A. saccharinum upon one
of our sugar-producing maples. Wangenheim in 1787 (Beytrag zur
teutschen holzgerechten Forstwissenschaft die anpflanzung
Nordamericanischer Holzarten, page 26), supposing that Linne's
description referred to the maple from which most of the sugar is
made, described and figured it under the name A.
saccharinum. Thus we have had two trees hearing the same name.
In 1803 Michaux described this as distinct from A.
saccharinum, and his name is therefore the earliest available
one. In Gray's: Manual this is still given the name A.
saccharinum.
44. Acer negundo L. Sp. Pl. 1056 (1753).
This is the Negundo aceroides Moench (Methodus Plantas
Horti Botanici et Agri Marburgensis, 1794), and this name has been
generally adopted in American manuals. In Gray's and Coulter's
Manuals this name is used. In some lists the name appears as
Negundo negundo (L.) Sudworth, while in still others, as
Rulac negundo (L.) Hitchcock. Since, however, this tree is
really a maple, there is no good reason for abandoning the name
originally given by Linne.
45. Rhus copallina L. Sp. Pl. 266 (1753).
46. Juglans cinerea L. Sp. Pl., ed. 2,
1415 (1763).
47. Juglans nigra L. Sp. Pl. 997
(1753).
48. Hicoria ovata (Mill.) Britton,
Bulletin Of the Torrey Botanical Club, 15:283 (1888). This was
first called Juglans ovata by Miller in the Gardener's
Dictionary, edition 8 (1768). In 1808 Rafinesque separated the
hickories generically from the walnuts under the name
Hicoria (by a typographical error printed "Scoria"), but
Nuttall, in ignorance of this, made a genus with the same
limitations, but with the name Carya
236 |
|
(Genera of North American Plants, 2:220, 1818). Nuttall's
name was taken up by botanists generally, that of Rafinesque being
allowed to remain in obscurity until it was revived by Britton in
1888. Through a mistake by Michaux (Flora Boreali-Americana,
2:193, 1803) this was called by him Juglans alba, but it is
not the J. alba of Linne (Sp. Pl. 997, 1753). Nuttall
transferred this mistake, calling this tree Carya alba, the
name by which it has generally been known. In Gray's Manual, even
in the latest edition, Nuttall's name is used.
49. Hicoria laciniosa (Michaux) Sargent,
Silva of North America, VII., 157 (1895). This is the H.
sulcata (Nutt.) Britton of previous lists, and is the Carya
sulcata of Gray's Manual.
50. Hicoria alba (L.) Britton, Bulletin
of the Torrey Botanical Club, 15:283 (1888). This is the Carya
tomentosa of Gray's Manual.
51. Hicoria glabra (Mill.) Britton,
Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 15:283 (1888). This is the
Carya porcina of Gray's Manual.
52. Hicoria minima (Marshall) Britton,
Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 15:283 (1888). This is the
Carya amara of Gray's Manual.
53. Quercus alba L. Sp. Pl. 996
(1753).
54. Quercus minor (Marshall) Sargent,
Garden and Forest. II., 471 (1889).
55. Quercus macrocarpa Michaux, Histoire
des Chenes de l'Amerique, 2 (1801).
56. Quercus acuminata (Michx.) Sargent,
Garden and Forest, VIII., 93 (1895). This is the Q. prinus,
var. acuminata of the fifth edition of Gray's Manual, and
the Q. muhlenbergii of the sixth edition. This last name
was used in the later lists issued by the botanical department of
the University.
57. Quercus prinoides Willdenow, Neue
Schrift. Gesell. Nat. Fr.
|
237 |
Berlin, 3:397 (1801). In the fifth edition of Gray's
Manual this bore the name of Q. prinus, var.
humilis.
58. Quercus rubra L. Sp. Pl. 996
(1753).
59. Quercus coccinea Muenchhausen, Der
Hausvater, V., 254 (1770), This species has commonly been
attributed to Wangenheim (1787), but Muenchhausen antedates him by
seventeen years.
60. Quercus velutina Lamarck,
Dictionnaire de Botanique, 721 (1783). This is the Q.
discolor of Aiton (1789), the Q. tinctoria of Michaux
(1803), and the Q. coccinea tinctoria of De Candolle
(1864), which name it still bears in Gray's Manual.
61. Quercus marilandica Muenchhausen, Der
Hausvater, V: 253 (1770). By a mistake in determination Wangenheim
described this tree (1781) under the name Q. nigra, which
Linne had applied to another tree, an error which has been
continued to the present, still occurring in the latest edition of
Gray's Manual.
62. Quercus imbricaria Michaux, Histoire
des Chenes de I'Amerique, 9 (1801).
63. Ostrya virginiana (Miller) Willdenow,
Species Plantarum, 4:469 (1805).
64. Carpinus caroliniana Walter, Flora
Caroliniana, 236 (1788). This is the C. americana of the
fifth edition of Gray's Manual, and the C. virginiana of
some previous lists.
65. Betula papyrifera Marshall, Arbustum
Americanum, 19 (1785).
66. Betula occidentalis Hooker, Flora
Boreali-Americana, 2:155 (1839).
67. Betula nigra L. Sp. Pl. 982 (1753).
© 2000, 2001 for NEGenWeb Project by Pam Rietsch, T&C Miller