|
267 |
March 4th, 1867--March 4th, 1871.
John M. Thayer settled in Omaha, Nebraska, in
the fall of 1854, a few months after the territorial organization.
He was born in Bellingham, Norfolk County, Massachusetts, January
24, 1820. Possessing a good education and hopeful of the future,
with a laudable ambition to succeed, he naturally challenged early
attention, gained the confidence of his associates, and found the
field of enterprise wide open for occupancy. Belonging to the
legal profession. it was not strange that visions of legislative
honors should have an enticing influence, and that in 1857, he was
found a candidate for congress in a "free for all," before the
organization of parties, in a case where four aspirants divided
among them 5,600 votes, each receiving 1,000, but Fenner Ferguson
having the highest number in the hundreds. Again in 1859 and then
in 1860 his name was placed before the Republican nominating
convention, but Samuel G. Daily, an original abolition republican,
became the nominee and delegate. He was elected to the territorial
council of 1860-61, and subsequently to a constitutional
convention. In the council he was author of a bill to abolish
slavery in Nebraska. In 1867 he entered the United States senate
for a term of four years and in 1875 was appointed governor of
Wyoming Territory.
Inasmuch as the entire eastern front of Nebraska
was first settled, bordering on the Missouri River, where numerous
Indian tribes had originally roamed at will, the peace and quiet,
the lives and property of emigrants were often at the mercy of
savage marauders.
So early as May, 1855, we find Gen. John M.
Thayer one of a commission to hold a council with the Pawnee
chiefs, under appointment of Governor Izard.
In July of the same year the governor
commissioned General Thayer to raise troops and give protection to
the settlers against the depredations of the Sioux.
268 |
|
In the summer of 1859 he led a force against
Indians in what was denominated "the Pawnee war," the results of
which were reassuring to the emigrants, and a lesson of power and
authority to the Indians. An article by Major Dudley in the second
volume of Nebraska Historical Society reports contains the
following: "One figure, too, stands out prominently in all this
history connected with every military affair or expedition, the
first brigadier general of the territory, colonel of its first
regiment to take the field in defense of the Union; brigadier and
brevet major general of United States Volunteers, and then, after
the war, United States senator, and now the recently elected
governor of our state, John M. Thayer."
While it is neither appropriate nor intended to
incorporate a military history of Nebraska with this brief sketch
of General Thayer's services, references must necessarily be made
to the fact that he was active and persistent in the organization
of the First Nebraska Infantry, afterward cavalry, becoming its
colonel and leading it in marches and skirmishes prior to its
participation in the battle of Fort Donelson, where on the 15th
day of February, 1862, it received its first "baptism of fire." As
colonel commanding the 2d brigade in General Lew Wallace's
division at the battle of Pittsburg Landing, Tennessee, known also
as Shiloh, he submitted a very minute, comprehensive and accurate
report of the participation of his command in that most important
and sanguinary contest. After stating the circumstances under
which it took position in line of battle on that memorable Sunday
night, he gave a graphic description of the steady retreat of the
Confederate line from "5 a. m. to 5 p. m.," before the steady
advance of the Union army, reinforced by Buell's command. He said,
"I cannot speak in terms of too high praise of the officers and
soldiers tinder my command. Their conduct was most gallant and
brave throughout. They fought with the ardor and zeal of true
patriots. It gives me pleasure to speak of the different regiments
and their officers. Nobly did the First Nebraska Sustain its
reputation, well earned on the field of Donelson. Its progress was
onward during the whole day in face of a galling fire of the
enemy, moving on
|
269 |
without flinching, at one time being an hour and a half in
front of their battery, receiving and returning fire, its conduct
was most excellent." Having in detail mentioned the Twenty-third
Indiana and the Fifty-eighth Ohio, surgeons and officers of his
staff, he "congratulated the general upon the part his division
took, and upon the success which attended all his movements in the
memorable battle of Pittsburg Landing." From this time on until in
July, 1865, when his active military career closed, he is seen
commanding a brigade of Iowa troops and leading a storming party
in the battle of Chickasaw Bayou, then in the battle of Arkansas
Post where his horse was shot under him, and through the siege of
Vicksburg, and appointed "Major General of Volunteers for gallant
and distinguished services"; with Sherman in the battle of
Jackson, Mississippi, and with General Steel in Arkansas in
command of the Army of the Frontier and ending with a command at
Helena, on the Mississippi river, and retiring to civil life,
brevetted a major general.
The duties of the military and Indian committees were so congenial to Senator Thayer, on account of a long army service and the deep interest his constituents had in the latter, that he was soon before the senate with bills, reports, and incidental remarks. On the 26th of March, 1867, three weeks after his admission to the body, a question was raised by a friend of the California Pacific Railroad as to the progress of the Union Pacific from Omaha westward. Thereupon General Thayer, with accuracy of statement and collected demeanor arrested the attention of the senate.
MR. THAYER: I would not trouble the senate with any remarks on this question except for the fact that this road runs through the entire state which I have the honor in part to represent on this floor, and in justice to the company who have had the building of this road, I feel it my duty to give utterance to a few words. I was surprised yesterday when the resolution was introduced by the honorable senator from California--not that he intended any injustice to the Union Pacific Railroad Company.
270 |
|
In a few days thereafter the records show Mr. Thayer engaged in an Indian war discussion, in which he had to arraign the report of a congressional committee, correspondents of the New York Tribune and Boston Journal, and an interview of the chairman of the Indian committee, together with numerous allegations made by senators in debate. With undisputed facts, and invulnerable arguments he met all comers and charges, and then appealed to the sense of the senate in the following compact sentences:
I stand here to say to the senate, speaking in behalf of every class of the community on the border, speaking in behalf of every industrial pursuit, that nothing can be more abhorrent, nothing more dreaded by them than an Indian war. Why, sir, until these hostilities upon the frontier everything was prosperous there; the commerce on the plains had risen to an immense magnitude; we could talk about the commerce of the Plains, as well as you could talk of the commerce of the seas and the lakes.
|
271 |
Continuing in a more subdued and humorous strain, we have the following:
My dear sir, the very gamblers and thieves which Chicago, and St. Louis, and New York, and Cincinnati, and Boston, and Philadelphia failed to hang dread an Indian war. We have some of that class of people there,--I am sorry for it, but it is because you in the East have not done your duty and hung them. They fled out there to escape but they do not represent the border. My friend from New York (Mr. Conkling) suggests that they do not come from New York. If so, it is because they treat them so kindly there that they do not have to run away. They vote the right way in New York City. [Laughter.]Senator Morrill of Maine having been very active in the discussion and full of the poetic idea of "Lo, the poor Indian," and deeply anxious that at least some stray rays of civilization's light might dawn upon the far West, received a cordial invitation to visit and be convinced.
I tell him as a friend, frankly, without prejudice, that he would come back with different ideas as to that section of country.
272 |
|
At the conclusion of a long and exhaustive speech, when a senator from Wisconsin offered an amendment for the removal of all Nebraska Indians to the Indian Territory, those who have charged Nebraska's persecution of Indians upon us, were astounded by the senator's concluding periods.
They commenced within six weeks after the settlers have crossed the Missouri River, and settled on lands which had been ceded to the United. States, to steal their cattle, and in the second raid killed two or three. But those days have passed. Since those Indians have been placed upon reservations there has been entire peace and quiet. There is good feeling between the Omahas, the Pawnees and others, even the Sioux, a band engaged in the Minnesota massacre, who are now located in the northern corner of Nebraska. They are on friendly terms with the whites; no collision, no clashing whatever. We do not ask to have those Indians removed. Thus at the end of the fortieth congress,
General Thayer had "won his spurs" on themes general to his
condition as a western representative.
At the first session of congress after the
election of General Grant, Senator Thayer presented Bill No. 1, to
repeal the act which had restrained President Johnson from making
removals, and for the violation of which he was impeached. Senator
Edmunds offered bill No. 2 to amend the same act, and Senator
Williams an amendment for its suspension during Grant's term of
office. In the house of representatives General Butler, of
Massachusetts, also presented a bill for its repeal. Many old
senators were loath to see the bill repealed, although they had
supported it as only for a temporary purpose.
|
273 |
Some feared they might seem to be currying
favor with General Grant, and others that they might be supposed
to have lost confidence in its utility. But General Thayer "slept
upon his arms," as at Shiloh, and kept his war paint bright, and
illustrated the maxim: "In peace, friends; enemies in war."
Many denied that the law refusing to allow a
president to remove certain officers, without consent of the
senate, was merely directed against Andrew Johnson.
To this General Thayer replied:
To the theory of suspending the law, he paid his compliments in the most direct and positive manner.
I say if the law is just and right as a permanent statute you are wrong in proposing its suspension. My honorable friend from Michigan (Mr. Howard) says it will be the highest compliment that we can pay to President Grant. My friend from Michigan, I know, enjoys a joke. The senator from Missouri (Mr. Schurz) having
denounced the distribution of patronage as a curse to a party, met
the following retort:
19
274 |
|
When General Grant sent the names of his first cabinet officers to the senate, he included among them A. T. Stewart, merchant prince of New York, who was ineligible, being an importer of merchandise, and therefore could not be secretary of the treasury; and hence his name was withdrawn and the mistake acknowledged. Senator Thayer took the prompt act of submission to law as an evidence of the new president's prompt and faithful enforcement of law in the future, and closed a long and able speech with the following sentence:
In that act of moral courage, of moral power, and of moral grandeur, he appears nobler than when he stood on the ramparts of Vicksburg, its conqueror, or when he received the surrender of the Confederate army of northern Virginia on the Appomattox.
In sight of the National Capitol and south of the Potomac River lies Arlington, once the estate of Washington Park Custis, adopted son of General Washington. General Robert E. Lee, of the Confederacy, having abandoned this venerable homestead, to join the rebellion, it was confiscated in 1863, and 200 acres set apart as a national cemetery in 1864. Within it repose the bodies of 16,000 soldiers, while the bones of 2,111 unknown rest in a granite sarcophagus, 220 feet in diameter and 30 feet deep. On the 13th day of December, 1870, Senator McCreery of Kentucky offered a resolution for the relief of Mrs. Robert E. Lee, looking to a settlement of her claim to Arlington. Fiery discussion became contagious, and it was soon evident that the resolution would not be received. Among those participating in the debate, Senator Thayer took a prominent part. He declared that he was somewhat in doubt while listening to the resolution and the sentiments uttered by the honorable senator from Kentucky, whether to give expression to his feelings, or to vote in silence. He proceeded:
|
275 |
Mr. McCreery said:
The melancholy tidings of the death of General Thomas, and the accents of sorrow which his surviving friends poured forth the national grief at his irreparable loss, are still fresh in our recollections when we learned that yet another of the great actors in the drama through which we have passed had breathed his last.To this General Thayer responded:
The linking together of the names of Thomas and Lee was unfortunate. It is true they were associates together in early life. Both educated by the United States to be its protectors when assailed, both took a solemn oath, written down by the angel, that they would forever be its defenders, against foreign or domestic foes. The one--Thomas--nobly, sacredly, grandly kept his oath. He fought for the flag of the Union and was faithful to the end. He has passed away. His name is inscribed on the rolls of immortal renown. The other was faithless to his solemn vow. With perjury in his soul he raised the black standard of treason and through all the scenes and vicissitudes, the dangers and trials and battles of four years, he fought with his best energies and his best efforts to. destroy the Union whose flag he had sworn to defend forever.It became evident to the senator from Kentucky that he had sown the wind and was reaping a cyclone, and inasmuch as his political and personal friends desired him to withdraw the offensive paper, he would have done so, but the rules of order made it impossible; besides the Nebraska soldier had his guns trained upon it, and was closing his lines, by gradual approaches. He continued:
276 |
|
On a final vote to grant leave to introduce
the resolution leave was denied, there being four in the
affirmative and fifty-four in the negative. There was no evidence,
however, that the three voting with Mr. McCreery approved of his
resolution. Being a member of the military committee the Nebraska
senator was always on the alert as to the rights and honors of
soldiers.
Hearing that the attorney general had given an
opinion that the states would have to agree to continue the
national cemeteries within their limits and might demand pay for
the ground, he offered a resolution of inquiry, and said:
|
277 |
On the question involving the reconstruction
of Virginia and Georgia, the senator indulged in a discussion
covering the whole ground of secession and constitutional
restoration of democratic and republican records diagnosing the
disease and prescribing the political remedies. Notwithstanding
all the two states had done in responding to the demands of
congress, he desired further indemnity for the past and greater
security for the future.
For congress he had words of eulogy, and for her
champions garlands of perpetual renown.
So much was the republican party divided upon questions at issue and the democrats silent that the General said:
I have remarked that a portion of the members of this body, those who belong to the opposite political faith, have remained entirely silent. They seem to be as serene and composed as a summer's morning, or, to be still more poetic, as calm and unruffled as the waters of a moon-lit lake.Turning upon his witty friend from Nevada, he said:
Mr. Nye described with affecting pathos the hardships inflicted upon this long-suffering, patiently waiting state of Virginia. She has waited till her locks are wet with the dews of night. Sir, let me say to that honorable senator, there are many people in Virginia today who are tired of waiting, waiting for that protection which this great government of the United States has vouchsafed to every citizen who respects its authority and obeys its command.
278 |
|
After a twenty years' calm, war having "smoothed his wrinkled front," and the sulphur of battle been replaced by the odor of flowers, and the great generals of the past having answered to roll call of death, and the rival orators of reconstruction just waiting to join the silent procession, all efforts to portray the stormy past by mutilated extracts must be as unsatisfactory as an attempt to represent the pantheon of old by a single block of Roman marble. The closing speech upon Georgia was worthy of the place and occasion.
The fruits of this legislation will reach on through the ages. Our task will be ended, our mission will be fulfilled, only when every other citizen of every state, of every hamlet within our wide border, be he poor or rich, be he humble or exalted, be he white or black, and of every religion and opinion, and of every nationality, and every color or doctrine, shall be in the full and equal possession and enjoyment of every blessing which a beneficent government can bestow. Then we may witness the ushering in of the reign of universal justice, of universal liberty, and of universal law. These shall be the crowning glories of the Nation. Then shall every citizen, wherever he may dwell between the oceans, feel and know that he is indeed and in truth a child of the great Republic. Then may all exultingly exclaim, "This is my country; this is my nation."
|
|
|