314 |
|
March 4th, 1881-March 4th, 1887.
Senator Charles H. Van Wyck was born at
Poughkeepsie, New York, in November, 1824; graduated at Rutgers
College, New Jersey; studied law and practiced; was district
attorney of Sullivan County from 1850 to 1856; was elected a
Representative from New York to the 36th congress, serving as a
member of the committee on mileage; was also elected to the 37th
congress and was appointed chairman of the committee on government
contracts; while in congress served in the volunteer service as
colonel of a regiment; in 1865 was appointed a brigadier-general
by brevet; was a delegate to the "Pittsburg Soldiers'" Convention
of 1865; was elected to the 40th congress, serving as chairman of
the committee on retrenchment; was a delegate, to the state
republican convention, 1867; was re-elected to the 41st congress,
removed to Nebraska in 1874; (was a delegate to the state
republican convention, 1867; was re- senator (sic) from 1876 to
1880; was elected United States Senator from Nebraska for six
years from March 4th, 1881. As a part of his personal history,
before becoming a citizen of Nebraska, he is entitled to the
following brief summary of a career as member of congress from the
state of New York:
No member of the 36th congress of 1858-60 met the pro-slavery tempest and stemmed the tide more boldly, adroitly and eloquently than C. H. Van Wyck, of the state of New York. For two months the house had been unable to elect a presiding officer, and the clerk of the previous congress had to preside while slavery made its last stand for political supremacy. Republicans, made up of Whigs and democrats of the free states, lacked a,few votes of enough to elect John Sherman, and finally succeeded with a number of "native Americans" in electing Pennington of New Jersey. The pro-slavery leaders were mostly
|
315 |
of the democratic party and hence were hearty prosecutors of
democratic republicans.
On this point of debate the following is
collated from the speech of the New York member, March 7th,
1860.
316 |
|
While Mr. Van Wyck met every argument, parried every thrust, unmasked every deception and moved upon every breastwork, his bold aggressiveness became so unbearable to the masters of the lash that Davis, of Mississippi (not Jefferson), exclaimed, "I pronounce the gentlemen a liar and scoundrel."
MR. DAVIS: Will you go outside the District of Columbia and test the question of personal courage with any southern man? This speech, so very elaborate and
exhaustive, established the fact that the New Yorker could neither
be worsted in the argument nor bullied into silence, and gave him
a strong hold upon a constituency who echoed his utterance, "You
cannot, you dare not resist. We threaten not with bayonet,
revolver or bowie knife, but with the silent ballot, 'which
executes a freeman's will as lightning does the will of God.'"
Congress closed this session June 28th, 1860,
and commenced again December 3d, 1860. During the interval the
republicans had elected Mr. Lincoln president, and the
disunionists were preparing for secession. Again Mr. Van Wyck
appears upon the stage, and, clad in the armor of the fathers,
challenges the con-
|
317 |
stituency of the cohorts of revolution. He charges upon them
that since 1842 three fourths of the territory acquired had been
surrendered to slavery and their "peculiar institution" increased
in numbers and power, while they posed as the friends of the
Union, "par excellence," and charged all the consequences of
meditated disunion upon the anti-slavery element of the country.
"The very men who then could not find words sufficiently strong to
anathematize those they called traitors, now seem to be courting a
traitor's doom and madly rioting in a traitor's saturnalia."
After this sentence came the "fireworks," and
amid a storm of excitement he was called to order. But the lion
was aroused, and to annihilate the doctrines of the fathers,
"Political incendiaries would trample upon the flag and burn the
temple of freedom." After impaling the leaders upon their own
arguments, now abandoned, they heard the fearful truth. "You have
been shorn of your strength by your own Delilah, and now in your
blindness would wrap your arms around the pillars of the republic
and perish in its ruin." The speech was a master effort, a
sunburst in a troubled sky. History was invoked, government
records displayed and the cicatrix of burning, blasting
denunciation applied to the wound.
REPUBLICAN APPEAL.
The first session of the 37th congress convened July 4th, 1861, and lasted for one month. Mr. Van Wyck was made chairman of the committee on revolutionary claims, and was conspicuous in urging the adoption of free letter postage for the soldiers, and even so early in the war, an investigation of army contracts, closing with the following appeal: "I appeal to my republican friends, let us be true to our former profession and see to it that plunder and peculation shall not follow on the track of our army. Let us watch the movements of the army contractors and take care that they shall not feast and fatten upon the freewill offering of the Republic, desiring that men who are so base
318 |
|
as to seek at this time to enrich themselves, should be held up
to the scorn of the world, never to be forgiven by the American
people. Those who are pirating upon our waters under a traitor's
commission of cupidity against the generous affections and
benevolence of a self sacrificing nation." This appeal was based
upon evidence that the army contractors and plunderers were
keeping pace with the troops of the Union, and had it been safe,
would have preceded them, stealing the forage and demanding its
value in gold.
The second session found the New York member
chairman of a committee, in hot pursuit of army contractors, their
methods, and frauds, and having his analytic skill supplemented by
practical knowledge in the field, being colonel of a New York
regiment, "the way of the transgressor was hard."
As the adornment of the base and crowning of the
summit should be germane to the object and solidity of the shaft,
so, did his speech on monumental frauds instruct, convince and
please as well in exordium and argument as in its peroration.
During its delivery a member from
Pennsylvania and who had a brother in the quartermaster's
department, feeling aggrieved, exclaimed, "I must have an
explanation here or elsewhere." Mr. Van Wyck: "I will meet the
gentleman here or elsewhere after my hour expires. I will answer
him or any other man here or at any other place."
Again in the 40th congress in 1867, he appears
fortified with four years' experience in exposing frauds and
unmasking official delinquencies and concealment of favorites. The
most adroit attacks upon the treasury or the purses of the people
were alike discovered and denounced. Of a gift enterprise he said:
"it contemplates taking $1,200,000 from the pockets of the people,
while the most they propose to donate to the object of charity,
the Gettysburg asylum, is $10,000." Another was thus described: G.
W. Thomas now proposes to raise $500,000 of which $150,000 is to
be drawn in prizes, and $200,000, principally, is to go into the
pocket of Thomas." From this mere glance at his
|
319 |
early record it is very easy to discover his natural and
unavoidable place as a Nebraska citizen and senator, where
monopolies, trusts and frauds cast their blasting, shadows across
his pathway.
Hon. C. H. Van Wyck entered the Senate of the
United States in 1881, as the successor of Senator A. S. Paddock;
having to his credit six years' experience as a member of the
House of Representatives in Congress; and the advantage of
military experience and that insight which resulted from having
been chairman of the committee on government contracts and of
retrenchment.
To the crying demands of the times he responded
as promptly as if directed by the hand of destiny, and devoted his
faculties to the congenial but very unpopular work of retrenchment
and reform. The few following extracts, from numerous and varied
speeches, indicate an aggressive spirit, self abnegation, a will
that never yields and a courage that never quails.
320 |
|
During the long and protracted discussion of this subject, he held his own in behalf of reform with irresistible arguments, sarcastic retorts and pungent criticisms; returning to it again January 22, 1883, he closed another brilliant discussion, as follows:
Mr. President--The hundreds of thousands in the prairie states are not considered in the making up of this bill, men to whom the Nation is more indebted than to all of your railroads and other corporations, men who have taken up the flag of the country and gone into its wilderness in advance and planted it on every prairie and by every water course.The subject being again before the senate, a few days later, gave an opportunity for the senator from Nebraska to string a succession of intellectual gems upon a golden chain.
MR. VAN WYCK: Now one word. It is a very good time now to illustrate what some few gentlemen have been trying to do in this bill. It is a bundle of inconsistencies from beginning to end--your whole tariff is. It is filled with them. I congratulate myself that my friend the senator from Connecticut (Mr. Platt) is getting upon the true Republican platform now--a tariff for revenue. I am rejoiced at that; and although I may regret a little the difference of opinion among the happy family of protectionists yet it illustrated that this inconsistency has been going on to a very great extent, so that our friend the senator from New Jersey has really got dizzy by the repetition of the ideas of this inconsistency.
321 |
|
My friend from Vermont says that Mr. Wharton is all
enterprising man. Certainly; he has got a mine. Who would not
be enterprising if the government, would get its arms under him
and give him the duty that is imposed on this metal?
I presume the senator from Vermont means to
say that the millions of this Nation shall he taxed for this
one man who happens to own a nickel mine.
My friend from New Jersey says that this
nickel mine is shut up, well let it be shut up, and closed
forever, if the whole American nation must be taxed,--every man
who desires to buy a little of the ore made from nickel--that
the whole of this American Nation must be taxed,--merely to
accommodate Mr. Wharton. I care not how respectable he may be;
and his one single nickel mine, I care not whether it may be
valuable or not,--it costs this Nation too much to run that
individual mine for Mr. Wharton.
You will probably protect, as you have
protected, the owners, of the eleven Bessemer steel companies,
and tax the whole United States to do it. You cannot see it
there; I believe the senator from Connecticut cannot see it
there; but he can see it when it is confined to only one mine,
to one man, and when it lays its heavy hand upon the
manufactures of Connecticut.
When the senator from Massachusetts talks of
protecting American labor, he thinks of a few thousand men and
leaves out of his view the millions who go forth and toil and
grapple with the soil. who receive no sort of consideration at
his hands; he has no poetry for that class of laborers. It is
the blushing cheek that he desires in the female operative in
his factory, but he does not think of the others. who live upon
the great Prairies of the west.
A mouth following this discussion again he participated in a running debate with distinguished Senators, and made a final appeal to his Republican friends.
I want to say to my political friends, as I think I have a right to say, what will be the effect if you issue your tariff from this congress and send it forth to the people and your pledges have not been redeemed? It is not that there is a surplus in the treasury of the United States at 22
322 |
|
During his first congressional term in the Senate we find him dealing out sage advice to his colleagues just as he did in the House when the Republican party, in its infancy, was becoming embarrassed with political barnacles, tramps, pirates and burglars.
I think I have a right to say that it is not prudent for the Republican party to adopt that policy which largely contributed to the destruction of the democracy.
|
323 |
On a subsequent occasion when his party had suffered a political defeat his condolence was of spiritual "wormwood and gall."
My friend, who is not here tonight, was on that committee, and when I appealed on behalf of these clerks who now exercise our brethren so much, and when I alluded to postal clerks whose pay had been reduced and said it was inhuman--I think that word has been used here once or twice-to pursue those men and force political assessments from them, my distinguished friend from Maine rose and asked very triumphantly, "Who is hurt?" [Laughter.] My distinguished friend from Iowa, only a few days ago, said that he discovered that the opinion of the people had crystallized on this question of political assessments. It certainly crystallized pretty hard when it struck Iowa pretty solidly in two or three places. Fortunately for us farther west it struck Iowa so hard that it bounded over Nebraska and landed on the Pacific slope. Crystallized! The public sentiment crystallized on the question twenty-two years ago, when by the report which was read during the last session it was shown that the iniquity of the Democratic party in that matter had found them out and the people denounced them. Let us make the laws as effective and as strong as we possibly can on this matter that these men may be protected and that the ballot box may be safe from corruption.When it was determined to exclude from the country foreign laborers brought here under contract, and the subterfuge was resorted to of importing them under the head of "skilled labor," Mr. Van Wyck, uttered the following:
It is a very easy thing for gentlemen who desire to import labor under contract to have it "skilled labor." The man who works in the mines is a "skilled laborer," I think, the man who works in a factory is a skilled laborer. When the men were locked out of the glass-making establishments in this country there were found skilled workmen to take their places; and when the iron manufacturers closed their doors against American workmen because they will not work at reduced wages, and sometimes at starvation wages equal to those of the pauper labor of Europe, then it will be said that it is "skilled labor" that is to be brought under contract from foreign countries. So I move that those words be stricken from the bill.
324 |
|
On a proposition to grant a $400,000 subsidy
to the Pacific Mail Ship Company, in order to encourage commerce,
protecting an "infant industry," which had been paying dividends
for a great many years the senator swept away the flimsy
disguise.
In attempting to discharge the duty of a reformer and protect the Treasury from legalized pillage the Senator had often to place gallantry in abeyance and discard for the moment all conditions of adventitious circumstances of sex or social position. Accordingly several years after $57,000 had been appropriated to cover all the expenses attending upon General Garfield and his burial; and after the pension of Surgeon-General Barnes (one of the attendants) had been raised from $30 to $50 per month, and an item in all appropriation bill offered Mrs. Garfield an additional $5,000 on account of meritorious services of her husband, Mr. Van Wyck moved to strike out the amount. The severity of the Senator's logic caused him to pay the debts of the government from the treasury, and to draw upon his own funds for gratuities and charity.
Occasionally his lessons of economy and equity were specifically directed to his colleagues.
MR. VAN WYCK: If there is any justice or honesty about the distribution of this part of the patronage--or plunder, as it should more properly be termed, patronage if we choose to call it by a milder term, because probably one-half the persons employed about this building are not necessary--we should act equally. We have doubled the ex-
|
325 |
The senator's amendment contemplated saving $25,000 on the salaries of five commissioners, and a large amount in rents stationery, transportation, etc.; but it failed to receive an affirmative vote.
326 |
|
At the third meeting of the Senate, March, 1885, in executive session, for the confirmation of the appointees of President Cleveland's cabinet and officers, Senator Van Wyck introduced a resolution directed to the new Secretary of the Interior, asking for information relative to the patenting of certain lands to the Texas Pacific Railroad, "whether the clerical force employed worked nights and Sunday so that they might be completed before March 4th." The Secretary, who should have worked the Sunday force March 3d, had become a Colorado Senator the next day, and was present to respond to the resolution.
MR. VAN WYCK: Mr. President, it. will be considered by the American people a matter of sincere regret that an administration--a successor to those commencing a quarter of a century ago to break the power of organized capital and check the aggressions of the greatest monopoly that ever cast its blight on this continent--should have clouded its good name far more than word or act of its enemies in the last day of its existence; that in the last agony of dissolution its final act should be at the dictation and in the interest of corporate wealth, whose power has grown to be as omnipotent and whose aggressions as deadly as those of the one overthrown. Beginning for the establishment of universal rights, it has traversed all zones to the highest elevation, only to be hurled in the end to the antipode of abject and humiliating surrender in the face of the Nation to a more tyrannizing monopoly than dominated the Republic in former years. Breaking the bonds of slavery, it subjugated the Nation to the fetters of corporations.
|
317 |
During the last congress of his senatorial term, having called upon himself the indignant exclamation of a Senator, "Let him back out of what he said yesterday," the defiant Senator from Nebraska retorted:
Our democratic brethren arraigned us very severely only last fall and have been doing it for several years past. They arraigned us in many matters, for the wasteful expenditure of money and wasteful extravagance in giving away the public domain. The government is not here. I would say to my friend from Connecticut: It is not in your little commission; it is not in your executive departments; it is at the hearthstones and homes of the people of Connecticut, and Missouri and Kansas and Nebraska. There is your government to-day, in the hearts of the American people; and when their representatives here, when their executive departments of congress fail to live up to what they believe to be the true principles of government, then they rise up as they did twenty-five. years ago, when they turned the Democratic party out of power and as they did Iast, fall when they turned the Republican party out of power. They are the government; there is where the government is.The chairman of the Judiciary Committee having declared no parties in the Senate or outside attempted to demonetize silver, Mr. Van Wyck responded:
Some years ago national banks in New York made an attempt to demonetize by ostracising (sic) silver, but as they were the immediate creatures of the law they shrewdly calculated the hazard of that venture. Now the wedge is to be entered in a different shape. Capital is arraigning itself
128 |
|
Having moved to increase the pension allowance of minor children and being met with the cry of economy, the Senator said:
Oh, yes, it is all very well; but this cry springs from the money center. It does not come from the great muscle of this land that pays the most taxes. The people who toil are not finding fault with what you pay out for pensions. The complaint does not come from the workshop, or the farm, or the counter. Oh, no; but the money centers have become alarmed; you see it in the great city of New York. An elegant statue was proposed to be erected. and a great City with its host of millionaires cannot find money enough to build even the pedestal to hold it, and they appeal to others for aid; to the men who drive the street cars, who work for sixteen or seventeen hours per day, and who then do not get money enough to break their fast. They are appealed to to raise money enough to complete a pedestal to receive the great work of Bartholdi. There is not a minor child on the pension roll but would ask my friend from Illinois and my friend from New Jersey and my friend from Kansas to stop just long enough to protect this very class.
|
329 |
On the supposition that congress gave railroads the right to occupy streets without providing a mode of assessing damages, Mr. Van Wyck said:
They were thrown on their common-law rights. Congress, so liberal in bestowing these privileges, I presume did not think it was wise to protect the citizens of Washington having residence upon either side of the streets, which they generously turned over to the occupation of the railroad corporations, and I think the senator will find that these citizens were driven to the courts in order to obtain redress. So it seems these mammoth corporations can take congress by the throat, and although it sits nine months in one year, and three in the next, the great representatives of the American Republic tremble before these huge corporations, and the only remedy for the individual, the citizen (who has no protection by reason of any self control on the part of the people here or any regulation of their own affairs) is that he must go to the courts singlehanded and alone to deny the right of a railroad company to enter the highways and streets and destroy the value of his property, and make it useless.
330 |
|
In the expiring days of his senatorial term
of six years, he delivered a most exhaustive speech upon a
proposition to amend the constitution of the United States so as
to secure the election of the United States senators by direct
vote of the people.
Having examined the causes which made senators
originally subject to legislative conditions, he claimed that a
crisis was approaching in which the people would recall the
delegated power and wield it through the omnipotence of the ballot
box.
|
331 |
332 |
|
|
|
|