362 |
|
March 4th, 1893--March 4th, 1899.
William Vincent Allen, of Madison, was born
in Midway, Madison County, Ohio, January 28, 1847; removed with
his step-father's family to Iowa in 1857; was educated in the
common schools of Iowa and attended the upper Iowa University at
Fayette for a time, but did not graduate; was a private soldier in
Company G, Thirty-second Iowa Volunteer Infantry, during the war
of rebellion, the last five months of his service being on the
staff of Gen. J. 1. Gilbert; read law with Hon. L. L. Ainsworth,
at West Union, Iowa, and was admitted to the bar May 31, 1869, and
practiced law from then until elected Judge of the District Court
of the Ninth Judicial District of Nebraska, in the fall of 1891.
He moved from Iowa to Nebraska in 1884; was married May 2, 1870;
was elected United States Senator, to succeed Algernon Sidney
Paddock, February 7, 1893, for the full term of six years,
commencing March 4, 1893, His term of service expired March 3,
1899.
The first appearance of Senator Allen in a
legislative session was in the extra one commencing August 7,
1893, convened by order of President Cleveland, to consider and
relieve the country from financial panic.
Having been a resident of Nebraska only nine
years, he had yet to acquire state and national recognition by
force of character and talent.
Coming from the ranks of a new party, which had
equally inflicted political injury upon each of the old ones, the
pious of the leaders drew upon their Bible treasures for, "What
will this babbler say?" But it was immediately evident that he
came not to "sit at the feet of Gamaliel," but to "tread upon his
toes," as indicated in his first speech, August 23, 1893.
|
363 |
He did not come into that august presence to apologize for his party but rather to utter its eulogy.
Mr. President, I am an humble member of a new political party that has recently come into existence and public notice, made necessary by the constant drifting of the Nation from its original constitutional moorings into the shallow and treacherous waters of unchecked power. The people-and I speak of the masses-have so frequently appealed to the general government for wise and humane monetary legislation, only to have their appeals fall on deaf or unsympathetic ears, that it became necessary as a matter of self-preservation for them to create a new political party, founded upon Jeffersonian simplicity, and imperatively demanding a return of the Nation to first principles of government; and I am pleased to say that this party, full of hope and confidence. is hourly growing in numbers, in courage, intelligence, and discipline, and will, sooner or later, force the two old parties of the Nation into administering the affairs of the government in the interest of the people, or into political disintegration and death.He magnified their sagacity:
The People's party of America, while taking strong grounds on the subject of national taxation, asserted in the most positive terms that the crowning question of this country and this age was the question of money; and in less than five months from the close of the election in November last the Nation was confronted with an industrial and financial depression such as has not been witnessed in this country for fifty years, if indeed its equal has ever been known.
364 |
|
Now within the arena, with banner bearing the motto, "In enemies, in peace friends," as though "to the manner born." all comers are challenged in unequivocal terms.
Mr. President--Is the President correct in his conclusion that the Sherman act is the cause of our trouble? In my Judgment, Mr. President, the Sherman act has nothing to do in the slightest degree with the evil that confronts us. No one has become frightened at the ability of this government to redeem every pledge it has made, as fast as its pledges shall become due.Illustrative of the promptness with which Senator Allen espoused official duties, the fact is that on the ninth day of the session he offered an amendment to a bill, providing that interest should cease upon bonds as the basis of bank note issue during the time such notes were in possession of the bond-holders, and upon request, volunteered a few explanatory remarks, concluding:
I desire to say that a majority of the people whom I represent, I will say nine-tenths of the people of the State of
|
365 |
He was neither astonished or alarmed at an exportation of gold, since the director of the mint stated that Austria and other European governments were raising the rates of exchange in order to enlarge their stock of gold; and especially since the International Gold Trust had forced some inferior nations to a gold basis. Said he:
Mr. President, of late we have heard it boldly asserted here and elsewhere, that silver is not the money of the constitution; and from the expression of the President in his message that "gold and silver must here part company, we have a right to believe that he, too, entertains this view of the question. I must confess my utter astonishment at this assertion, in view of the language and purpose of the constitution, the history of the time when it was framed and adopted by our ancestors, the treatment of the question by congress in our coinage legislation, the voice of the judiciary when speaking on the subject, and the treatment of the matter by the various political parties in their respective platforms. All these, when impartially considered, demonstrate that silver is, and ever has been, the money of the constitution, and it cannot now be abandoned by congress without a flagrant and inexcusable refusal on our part to, in good faith, enforce, in the interest of the nation at large, a power expressly enjoined upon us for the general welfare.In behalf of silver coinage he gave the history of Washington's time of the constitution--the approving opinion by Webster--decisions of U. S. courts and friendly legislation for a term of 81 years. He supplemented this with many resolutions of Republican and Democratic conventions, both state and national. And finally overwhelmed Senator McPherson with a deluge of authorities to the following effect:
Intrinsic value of a thing stamped or coined has nothing to do with the question of power. Such metals so stamped
366 |
|
He was often very fortunate in giving a condensed view of arguments and statements, in a few well chosen words, as in the case of "balance of trade":
Mr. President, we have been told that the nation in whose favor the "balance of trade" exists at the close of the trading season is to be considered the most fortunate nation, and that we must so order the affairs of this country as to annually obtain this balance of trade. A balance of trade is only a national blessing when it represents some profit to our people. If it is bought by the sale of our products far below their cost, and at a sacrifice of our civilization, it is a curse rather than a blessing. Of what benefit can it be to the people of this country if they should obtain the entire stock of European gold by a sacrifice of their property and labor, while Europe may be enjoying their products as well as profits? If the balance of trade is to be purchased at a sacrifice, we have only to indulge in such luxury for a few years to completely pauperize our labor and destroy our national wealth. It would be better for our people, better for our aggregate wealth, if the balance of trade should be annually against us than to purchase it at too great a sacrifice.Also in reference to equality or parity:
How is it expected to institute a comparison between two unequal things--two things that are, according to an imperative law of nature, considered as articles of commerce traveling in opposite directions? Gold daily growing more scarce and in greater demand throughout the civilized world, and silver crippled by being denied equal coinage privileges at the mints, growing more plentiful, with lessened money use, it must be expected that their commercial value will radically differ. But put both metals upon an equality before the law, and they will stand equal in the commercial and monetary world. I do not doubt that the very moment silver is permitted free access at the mints its price will go up throughout the civilized world. Only last week the London silver market advanced in anticipation of the action of congress retaining the present Sherman act.
|
367 |
One valuable feature of the speech was an analysis of the gold of the world, showing that it was controlled largely by European and foreign powers; and the unavoidable conclusion:
We have, then, one of three remedies open to us-- This maiden effort was prefaced with the
statement that he had, in part, the honor of representing "nearly
one million and a half of American citizens" though he feared he
might be charged with too early seeking an opportunity to be heard
on the floor of the Senate.
By the time he came to the following conclusion,
the members were fully satisfied that they "had a foeman worthy of
their steel":
368 |
|
On the 13th day of September we find him
declaring that senators who are officers or stockholders of banks
should not vote in cases where pecuniary interests are involved,
on the principle of the common law, excluding judges and jurors,
from action in eases where they were pecuniarily interested.
On September 27th his speech was a plea for
deferring action on the absorbing question of "unlimited coinage
of silver" till the States of Washington, Wyoming and Montana
could elect each another Senator:
W. V. ALLEN.
|
369 |
On September 30th he is heard on the subject of a double standard:
MR. ALLEN: If a dollar, of whatever material it be composed, possesses debt-paying qualities, is it not as good as every other dollar? Would it not be as wise to say of a watch, composed of steel, brass and gold, that it is three watches instead of one, as to say that we have a double or different standard of money?On the 3rd of October, when there was a disposition to deny certain information to congress he proclaimed:
That except in mere matters of diplomacy, which are in charge of the executive branch of the government, the legislative branch is entitled to all information essential to assist it in the discharge of its duty upon a resolution or request, not merely that it may have it in the grace of another department, but that it has a constitutional right to it, without any equivocation on the part of the other branch of the government?October 4th, on the subject of contraction he said:
I wish to call attention to the fact that in 1866 the government commenced the process of contracting its currency, and before 1873 it had called in over $600,000,000 of its paper money and destroyed it.October 11th, on the subject of majority rule he was very explicit:
Mr. President--It is quite true that a majority have a right to rule in this country, but they have a right to rule only when the minority have expressed their opinion according to legal methods and in accordance with the constitution or the statutes creating and giving power to the minority to express themselves. Nothing is better settled in this country (and I diverge at this point for a moment) than that this is a government of laws, not of men; and whenever the constitution gives a minority the right to contest the ground occupied by a majority and eventually bring them to their senses, if they have lost their senses upon any public question, the minority have a right to do that without being charged with being filibusters or obstructing the orderly conduct of the government.
370 |
|
The real question at issue was, Shall an act
be passed denying the right of the government to further purchase
silver for coinage, without restoring to the people the right of
"unlimited coinage," which they had possessed for 81 years prior
to 1873?
Half the Democrats of the Senate, with a
majority of the Republicans, making a small majority of the whole
body were willing to repeal the purchasing clause of the Sherman
act of 1890, without restoring "free coinage," while the balance
of the Democrats, with a minority of Republicans and the four
Populists, were willing to repeal the act, and in the same bill
restore the "unlimited coinage of silver."
In behalf of the last proposition Senator Allen
delivered the introduction of his astonishing speech October 7th,
and on the 11th commenced again and continued it from 5
P. M. to 8 A. M.,
October 12th - fifteen hours.
The supposed majority could not stop debate,
because the Senate had no rule allowing a call of the previous
question. So they determined to keep the Senate in perpetual
session till, overcome for want of sleep and rest, the silver
advocates should submit to a final vote.
They further determined that they should not
transact any other business during the time they were exhausting
their energies, and hence refused to adjourn the Senate for two
weeks but used a recess to carry them over from day to day.
So when the chaplain opened the Senate with
prayer October 1st, they dismissed him for the time being, as that
day was to last till they could force a vote.
Of this parliamentary strategy Mr. Allen spoke
as follows:
|
371 |
for gold is their god. Not only so, but in consequence of not having another legislative day, this government is put at the absolute mercy of one man. It is a complete revolution of our government. It takes here, for instance, unanimous consent for the last ten days to get a measure, however important it may be, before this body. Suppose something should occur requiring our instant attention, it would require the unanimous consent of Senators here to enable us to consider it. There is a complete change in the organization. The right of petition, held sacred under our constitution, regarded as sacred by every citizen of this land, is cut off here in consequence of this continuous session. Every safeguard guaranteed to the people of this country by the constitution must be abandoned or imperiled for the instant accomplishment of this infamous This is something that in my judgment ought not to exist in a legislative body of the dignity and responsibility of this.
During the night sessions the majority
learned that "chickens come home to roost," for silver party
advocates decided that a quorum of the Senate should be present at
all times, and as often as the repealers betook themselves to cots
and lounges in the cloak rooms for slumber, a call of the Senate
was ordered, and they had to return and answer to their names.
At 8 o'clock on the morning of the 12th the
majority saw their theory of wearing out Silver Senators
completely exploded by the "bright and early" Senator from
Nebraska.
372 |
|
During the delivery of the speech twenty-two
Senators, by the courtesy of the speaker, entered the list with
questions and replies until they consumed half his time with
pertinent, impertinent and irrelevant issues.
Mr. Allen sustained his positions with extracts
from twenty-four accredited authors upon financial and economic
questions, showing great and patient research.
His time was broken in upon by about a dozen
roll calls. Intending to be courteous and fair in all things, but
pertinaciously beset by Senators of both the old parties, a
reformer's aggressiveness and tact stood him in good demand, and
evinced a willingness to select his own weapons and stand by his
colors.
In reply to Mr. White of Louisiana he said:
"Mr. President, I do not propose to stand here and answer such
questions as are put to me by the Senator from Louisiana. The
Senator from Nebraska will pursue his own course in this
debate."
To Mr. Squire: "I do not think I will permit the
Senator from Washington to inject anything into my speech."
To Mr. Hoar: "I do not know what the Senator
from Massachusetts means, whether he means to insult me. I do not
think that his question calls for an answer."
To Mr. Gallinger: "I do not care anything about
what the Senator from New Hampshire believes. He should be more
careful of his language. The Senator from Nebraska understands the
ordinary English language and its use."
To Mr. Palmer: "Several Senators have attempted
to make me assault my own state. It is not only disagreeable, but
it is not true."
Mr. Allen having called Senator Palmer to order,
for charging him with speaking against time, said, "I will not
suffer an imputation of that kind to be made without a
denial."
|
373 |
Long as this prelude is, it only gives a mere
glimpse at the concomitants of a speech of national fame.
Mr. Allen said:
Mr. President--The first time I appeared in the Senate I felt as though I ought to apologize for doing so. The first time I had occasion to submit some observations upon the measure now under consideration I felt that I was under an obligation to apologize to the Senate for doing so and for breaking what I understand is an unwritten rule which has been in force in this body for many years, that a new member shall listen rather than talk. I presume if any apology is due from me to-day it is not to the Senate or the United States, but to Wall Street and Lombard Street for delaying somewhat the passage of the measure now before the Senate.
|
|
|