John Tafft for Congress. I went on
in December, and worked hard for the admission of the
State, which was admitted on the 2d of March, It then
became a question of whether myself and the two
Senators, who had been elected to represent the State,
Gov. John M. Thayer and Thomas W. Tipton, should be
sworn into the Thirty-ninth Congress or should wait
until the 4th of March, and be sworn in on the
Fortieth Congress. They both determined that they
would wait for the Fortieth Congress. This would give
them two years longer time. I could have waited and
been Congressman for the Fortieth Congress, and as
there was no law in the enabling act to elect but one
Congressman, I knew that under the law I could hold my
seat, and was advised by my friends not to be sworn in
until the Fortieth Congress, and I admit it was
something of a temptation to do as the Senators
proposed to do, and which would give me two years
instead of two days in Congress; but, on the other
hand, 1 reflected that it would hardly be the right
thing toward my friend John Tafft, and hence, as soon
as the State was admitted, I appeared on the floor of
the House and was sworn in. Politicians from Nebraska,
looked at it as a foolish move; I deemed it but right.
It was the right thing to do, but I never got credit
for it. I believe there was no paper in Nebraska, that
spoke of it at all, but what spoke of it as being
foolish upon my part. I recollect one of the papers in
commenting upon it said that the Senators were sharp
enough not to be sworn in till the Fortieth Congress;
I had no more sense than to go in and be sworn out of
a two-years term of Congress. I looked upon it as the
right thing to do, and would do it again." Mr.
Marquett added, "You see I am a failure as a
politician." But we think this but illustrated Mr.
Marquett's character; he would rather do a square
thing than be Congressman for two years.
Our subject now returned to
Plattsmouth, where he resumed the practice of law. He
changed his residence to Lincoln in 1874, and soon
afterward formed a partnership with Amasa Cobb. They
practiced law until 1878, under the firm name of Cobb
& Marquett, and sometimes under the firm name of
Cobb, Marquett & Moore. Mr. Cobb was then
appointed Judge of the Supreme Court, and our subject
continued the business mostly alone for some time. He
is now at the head of the firm of Marquett, Deweese
& Hall, and enjoying an extensive and lucrative
practice of his profession. Mr. Marquett has been
twice married; first in November, 1861, to Miss
Harriet Border, a native of Illinois, who died at her
home in Lincoln, in June, 1883, leaving four children:
The eldest, Bell, is now the wife of Clifford Teft;
Harriet married George H. Fawell; and Gertrude and
John are at home.
Mr. Marquett contracted a second
marriage in 1885, with Mrs. Asenath Stetson. The
family residence is pleasantly located on the corner
of P and Eighteenth streets, in this city, and Mr. and
Mrs. Marquett enjoy the acquaintance and friendship of
the cultivated people of Lincoln. On inquiry Mr.
Marquett told the writer that he was not a rich man as
some thought he was, but what he had he thought fairly
represented what he has made under our free contract
system. He has never been able to make anything by
speculation. Mr. Marquett added, "My religion largely
consists of the belief that a man ought to be
satisfied with what he can squarely earn under the
free contract'; system, dealing justly with all, and
that the sin of our times is in the great efforts of
so many trying to get something for nothing." He has
always voted the Republican ticket, and has held his
present position in connection with the Burlington
& Missouri River Railroad since 1869, a period of
nearly twenty years. He has been a close student and
extensive reader, well balanced mentally, has made a
good record in his particular field of labor, and we
take pleasure in presenting his portrait in the most
prominent place in this
ALBUM.
Mr. Marquett's success as a lawyer
depends upon the thoroughness with which he always
understood his case, not only the general outline, but
in detail. In the trial of a case he was original, and
the opposite counsel might look for the case to take
an unexpected turn at any time. I was told the
following expedient of his to test the credibility of
a witness: He was defending a man for murder; the
murder had been committed by sending a bottle of
whisky through the express office drugged with poison;
the evidence of the prosecution depended
|