Bio: Mularkey, Gladwyn (Convicted of Manslaughter – Dec 1918)
Contact: Ann Stevens
Email: ann@wiclarkcountyhistory.org
Surnames: Mularkey, Mathews, Rush, Crosby, Kurth, Housely, Thoma, Stockwell,
Paulson, Root, Warlum, La Reau, Petznick, Rausch, Wren, Swartling, Ghent,
Moganson, Campman, Holtz, Gluch, Howard, Dehnert, Lapp, Brown, Toptine, Ure,
Widman, Blecha, Olson, Polensik, Neinas, Quicker, Hoey Wood
----Source: Neillsville Times (Neillsville, Clark Co., WI) 12/12/1918
Mularkey, Gladwyn (Convicted of Manslaughter – 9 Dec 1918)
The trial of Gladwyn Mularkey, charged with manslaughter, has been the center of
attraction in circuit court since last Thursday. Mularkey is on trial for the
killing of Dan Mathews, when the car which Mularkey was driving struck Mathews
on the Ridge Road on the evening of Oct. 8, 1918. Mathews was so badly injured
that he died shortly after the accident and Mularkey was on trial last week on a
charge of manslaughter.
The trial has attracted a great amount of attention and the court room has been
filled with interested spectators during every session. District Attorney Rush
handled the State’s side of the case, while E.W. Crosby defended Mularkey. The
State had a considerable number of witnesses and the burden of the testimony
offered by the State was to the effect that Mularkey was driving the car at such
a high rate of speed that he was unable to control it and that this unlawful and
careless driving was the cause of the death of Dan Mathews.
Wm. Kurth was the first witness for the State, he having been attracted to the
scene of the accident shortly after it occurred. He testified as to the
condition of the road, the width and other details which concerned the ability
of the car to be driven past the wagon driven by Mathews. He also testified that
the accident occurred about 9 o’clock that evening.
Dr. Housely, physician from Granton, testified to being called to attend Mathews
and that he had started for Granton with the injured man and that he had died on
the way to Granton.
W.C. Thoma, county superintendent of roads, was the next witness for the State,
his testimony bearing upon the width of the road at that point, its structure,
etc.
C.S. Stockwell was one of the principal witnesses for the State. He is a civil
engineer and made measurements of the scene of the accident, submitting three
maps. Mr. Stockwell showed that at this point of the road, an approaching car
could first see the wagons and teams in the road 1800 feet away and that a
slight depression in the road then hid the wagon until the car would be about
850 feet away. That had the car driven by Mularkey been going at a reasonable
rate of speed, it could have been brought under control in plenty of time to
stop until the road was cleared for the approaching car. Mr. Stockwell’s
testimony throughout indicated that the automobile was being driven at an
unlawful rate of speed.
Ross Paulson, owner of the team and wagon driven by Mathews, testified that the
wagon was in good shape, sound and strong, and that it was at the time hauling
80 bushels of grain to Granton. That the wagon had been badly smashed by the
auto, the rear hind wheel broken, the tire bent, the rack broken and the king
bolt bent, all of which was to show that the car struck the wagon while going at
a very high rate of speed.
H.M. Root, the owner of the car, was a witness to identify the ownership of the
car.
P.M. Warlum was also an important witness for the State. He had gone to the
scene of the accident soon after the accident occurred. On his way out he had
picked up Gladwyn Mularkey and Armond La Reau, taken them back to the scene of
the accident with him and then brought them to Neillsville and placed them in
jail. His testimony was such as would indicate also that the auto was driven at
a very high rate of speed, and also pertained to the condition and position of
the wagon in the road and that the tracks made by the car after it had struck
the wagon and then run off the side of the road into the plowed field on the
south side of the road.
Robert Petznick, cheese maker who lives at Kurth’s Corners, was a witness to
establish the time of the accident and also to the fact that Mularkey came to
his house and phoned to Granton for a doctor for Mathews.
Wallace Rausch was with Mathews on the night of the accident, driving one of the
teams hauling grain and his team being in front of that driven by Mathews. The
two were on their way from Shortville to Granton with two loads of grain. Rausch
had seen the lights of the approaching car and had called to Mathews that a car
was coming. Mathews had gone around to the heads of his team with the intention
of holding them until the car had gone by. Rausch was the first to reach Mathews
after he had been struck and picked up by the car and carried along on the front
fender of the car.
Richard Kurth was a witness for the State in establishing the time of the
accident.
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Wren had been at Neillsville on the evening the accident
occurred. He was driving east from town when the Root car, driven by Mularkey,
passed him on the old Youmans farm on the Ridge Road. Both Mr. and Mrs. Wren
testified that they were driving at about 25 miles an hour and that Mularkey
drove past them at a very much higher rate of speed.
T.E. Swartling was coming into Neillsville that evening and met the Root car
going east near the H.O. Huckstead farm. Mr. Swartling’s testimony was to the
effect that the Root car was being driven faster than 25 miles an hour when it
went by him.
Hilda Petznik was a witness for the State to establish that the time of the
accident was about 9 o’clock, for she had gone to bed at 8:30 and had been in
bed for a short time when she heard the approaching car for about a mile away.
She had gone back to bed and shortly after heard the smash of the accident.
Henry Ghent, Pete Paulson and E.E. Moganson were witnesses for the State to show
the damage to the car and the manner in which it had been smashed up.
Mrs. Robt. Petznick stated that the accident occurred between 8:40 and 9 o’clock
in the evening.
W.A. Campman, who conducted the coroners’ inquest, stated that Mularkey had
admitted to being the driver of the car at the inquest.
The State rested with this evidence and the defense then brought up its
witnesses.
Gladwyn Mularkey, the defendant, was the first witness. He testified that he was
19 years of age and came here from Oxford in July to work for his brother, A.R.
Mularkey. That he was preparing to go to Chicago to enlist in the army motor
corps the following week and had met Armond La Reau on the streets of
Neillsville on the evening of Oct. 8th. The two boys had met Miss Lillian Holtz
and Miss Emma Gluch and asked them to go with them for a ride. Miss Gluch
telephoned and received permission from her mother to take the ride and the four
had taken the Root car from the Mularkey garage and started east on the Ridge
Road. The defendant testified that the brakes on the Root car did not work
properly and that it could not be stopped in the time that a car is ordinarily
stopped. That he was driving the car and Miss Holtz was in the front seat with
him. That fog and haze had gathered on the windshield and that he had wiped the
fog off three times. That he was spot light and was therefore unable to see the
road clearly on account of the haze. When approaching the Kurth’s Corners he had
seen a team standing in the middle of the road and had immediately applied the
foot brakes and slowed down to about 15 miles per hour. As he approached the
wagon the north side of the road or legal side for passing a team looked as
though there was a deep hole and pile of stone on that side of the road and as
the team was standing still, he had used his best judgment and tried to pass the
team on the right side (the wrong side for passing a vehicle.) As he started to
pass the team Mathews stepped out in front of his team and that he then applied
the emergency brake, but that it would not hold, with the result that he turned
the car into the ditch. As he went by, his car struck Mathews. Mularkey then
drove the car into the field at the south side of the road, stopped it and then
started the car up again twice to try and get it back into the road. He also got
out of the car, went back and when he found that Mathew had been hurt, he went
to the nearest telephone and called for a doctor. He admitted that he had
previously driven about 20 to 25 miles an hour, but that when the accident
occurred, the car was not going faster than 15 miles an hour. He claims that
when he put on all the brakes on the car that it slewed to the north and that
the rear of the car had struck the wagon. The damage to the car would tend to
show that the rear of the car did come in contact with the read end of the wagon
for the front of the car was not badly smashed.
Miss Lillian Holtz and Miss Emma Gluch testified to substantially the same as
Mularkey regarding their part in the accident. They had gone riding with the
boys, leaving Neillsville at 8 o’clock in the evening.
Armond La Reau was with Mularkey in the car, being in the rear seat with Miss
Gluch. He had helped young Rausch in trying to carry the body of Mathews into
the road to await the arrival of the doctor.
Mrs. L.H. Howard, having often driven the Root car, was a witness for the
defense to show that the brakes did not hold well.
L.H. Howard gave testimony for the defense, he being very familiar with the Root
car. He too testified that the brakes on the car were not sufficiently strong to
hold a car of this size and that this style of brake had been discontinued. That
in order to stop the car at a given spot, the driver would have to slow down 500
to 600 feet away.
Will Dehnert testified to substantially the same as Howard, that the brakes were
defective.
A.R. Mularkey testified as to the condition of the car, the defective brakes and
the damage done to the car by the accident.
The case went to the jury Monday afternoon. The jury was composed of Jacob Lapp,
E. Brown, Newton Toptine, Ray Ure, Rich. Widman, Frank Blecha, John Olson, Paul
Polensik, Ernest Neinas, James Quicker, E.J. Hoey and Earl Wood.
The prosecution built its case upon the fact that Mularkey had been exceeding
the lawful rate of speed and was driving carelessly and without due caution and
that in striking Mathews he was directly responsible for the latter’s death and
should be convicted of manslaughter.
The defense built its case about the defective condition of the car and
attempted to show that Mularkey was exercising due care and caution and that in
trying to pass the team on the wrong side of the road, he had exercised his best
judgment and care in selecting the side of the road which indicates the least
dangerous side to pass on.
The defense also showed that as the accident occurred after 8:30 and the party
had left Neillsville at 8 o’clock, they need not have driven fast in order to
traverse the five miles in 30 minutes.
The case went to the jury at 5 o’clock Monday afternoon and at 7:00 that
evening, the jury returned a verdict of manslaughter in the fourth degree.
The case was a very interesting one and was closely agreed and contested by both
sides.
© Every submission is protected by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998.
Show your appreciation of this freely provided information by not copying it to any other site without our permission.
Become a Clark County History Buff
|
|
A site created and
maintained by the Clark County History Buffs
Webmasters: Leon Konieczny, Tanya Paschke, Janet & Stan Schwarze, James W. Sternitzky,
|