|
DAILY-ESTABROOK CONTEST
|
291
|
town near the Kansas line in Richardson county, that
supports a half dozen whisky shops, an equal number of
dilapidated dwelling-houses and one horse taverns, boasted
that they could "import" all the voters they wanted from
Kansas. This is the celebrated town founded by Jim Lane, and
peopled by him with a scurvy horde of rapscallions fresh
from the "sands" of Chicago and the Five Points of New York,
as he was on his way to the memorable invasion of Kansas. Is
it to be wondered that in a democratic county such a town
within a stone's throw of the Kansas line, should cast for
the republican candidate for congress one hundred and
forty-three votes out of one hundred and seventy-two? The
town could legitimately cast perhaps seventy-five votes.
Every intelligent man at all conversant
with politics in Richardson county knows that that county is
democratic by at least two hundred majority. Yet the
democratic candidate for congress gets barely thirty-nine
majority. Pawnee county out of one hundred and forty-six
votes gives the democratic candidate barely twenty-two
votes. Does any one doubt that the Kansas abolitionists have
played their high game of fraud and illegal voting?
The Dakota City Herald made a
statement in regard to the Buffalo county part of the case,
which, while it may have been colored by partisanship, yet
throws an interesting light on the facts and conditions
pertaining to the elections of that year:
The Republican papers say that there were
frauds perpetrated in Fort Kearney and L'Eau Qui Court
county, both which places gave Estabrook a goodly number of
votes; the former yielding him 292 majority and the latter
128. On the other hand it is charged that he republicans
polled a large number of illegal votes in Douglas,
Richardson, Pawnee, Clay and Gage . . . The Omaha
Republican says that not fifty legal voters reside in
the two counties of Hall and Buffalo. Had we not known that
this statement was, to say the least, incorrect, it might
have passed for what it purported to be in this part of
Nebraska; but having visited Fort Kearney several times
during the past three years, we know from personal knowledge
that there are more than fifty legal voters there. At no
time we were there was there less than three times that
amount. As voters, whether they might be termed "legal" or
not we leave others to judge. They were chiefly government
teamsters, herders, employees about the fort, Majors,
Russell & Waddell's employees, sutlers and their clerks,
trappers, traders, and a few gamblers. Last spring it would
be safe to say there were three thousand voters at the fort,
including those a few miles above and below. We know several
who became discouraged at the report from the mines, but
determined not to go back. One party went and settled on the
Little Blue; another crowd laid off a town six or eight
miles below the fort. A number of others went a few miles
above to fashion a city and called it after an illustrious
Pole. The probability is there are a large number of persons
there, and that they have daily increased since spring.
While we state these as matters of fact, we do not say there
were no illegal votes polled. Indeed, it would be strange if
there were not, when it is charged that in the city of
Omaha, in the face of the law, and despite the vigilance of
the sentinels of both parties, a negro cast a democratic
vote and ten citizens of Iowa who were just passing through
the town on their way home, voted for Daily. We do say,
however, that in the absence of proof to the contrary, we
accept and believe the 292 majority for Estabrook to be all
right. Now for L'Eau Qui Court. We never were in that
county, nor any nearer to it than Dakota City, and cannot
speak by authority. But what strikes us as strange is this
fact: that county is represented to be republican. They
elected a republican county ticket and gave Judge Taffe, a
republican, a large majority over Judge Roberts, democrat,
for float representative. Being of the conservative kind,
and not having their republican belief tinctured with
abolitionism, they voted for Estabrook to a man. Since the
election not one of these republicans has breathed a breath
of "fraud," nor anyone else that we know of, nearer than the
Republican office at Omaha.
Daily was declared entitled to his seat
without a roll call, May 18, 1860. It is not likely that
Estabrook's blunder in not offering any contradictory
testimony would have changed the result. There was a richer
field for irregularities in his section of the territory
than in Daily's, and so it would have been difficult, and
probably impossible for him to overcome this natural
presumption against himself before a more or less prejudiced
committee and house. After the certificate had been given to
Estabrook by the territorial canvassers conservative opinion
was averse to a contest on this ground: "One great reason
why so little has heretofore been secured for Nebraska is
that she has never yet had a delegate so situ-
|