| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alabama—
1888—Seay, d, 155,973; Ewing, r, 44,470
1890—Jones, d, 139,910; Long, r, 42, 440
1892—Jones, d, 126,959; Kolb, opp, 115,522
Arkansas—
1888—Eagle, d, 99,214; Orwood, lab, 84,233
1890—Eagle, d, 106,267; Fizer, r, 85,233
1892—Fishback, d, 90,115; Whipple, r, 33,644; Carnahan, peo, 31,117; Nelson, pro, 1,310
California—
1882—Geo. Stoneman, d, 90,694; M M Estee, r, 67,175; W H McDonald, pro, 5772; T J McQuiddy, gbk, —
1886—Bartlett, d, 84, 970; Swift, r, 84,318; Russell, pro, 6,432; Wigginton, amer, 7,347
1890—Pond, d, 118,601; Markham, r, 126,432; Bidwell, pro, 10,868
Colorado—
1888—Patterson, d, 39,197; Cooper, r, 44,490; Storer, peo, 2,098; La Matyr, pro, 1,085
1890—Yeaman, d, 35,359; Routt, r, 41,827; Ellett, pro, 1,058; Coy, Fa, 5,199
1892—Maupin, d, 8,944; Helm, 4, 38,806; Waite, peo and sil d, 44,242; Hipp, pro, 1,764
Connecticut—
1888—Morris, d, 75,074; Bulkley, r, 73,659; Camp, pro, 4,631; Andrews, lab, 263
1890—Morris, d, 67,662; Merwin, r, 63,976; Augur, pro, 3,413
1892—Morris, d, 82,787; Merwin, r, 76,745; Augur, pro, 3,927; Ripley, peo, 773
Delaware—
1882—Stockley, d, 16,558; Curry, r, 14,620
1886—Biggs, d, 13,942; Hoffecker, pro, 7,835
1890—Reynolds, d, 17,801; Richardson, r, 17,258
Florida—
1883—Perry, d, 32,087; Polk, r, 27,845
1888—Fleming, d, 40,255; Shipman, r, 26,485
1892—Mitchell, d, 32,068; Baskin, peo, 8,379; Hawley, pro, 302
Georgia—
1888—Gordon, d, 121,999 (no opposition)
1890—Northen, d, 105,365 (no opposition)
1892—Northen, dem, 140,492; Peck, peo, 68,990
Idaho—
1890—Wilson, d, 7,948; Shoup, r, 10,262
1892—Burke, d, 6,769; McConnell, Jr, r, 8,178; Crook, peo, 4,865; Clark, pro, 264
Illinois—
1884—Harrison, d, 319,599; Oglesby, r, 334,222; Hobbs, pro, 10,764; Harper, gr, 8,642
1888—Palmer, d, 355,319; Fifer, r, 367,860; Harts, pro, 18,915; Jones, u l, 6,364
1892—Altgeld, d, 425,497; Fifer, r, 402,659; Barnett, peo, 20,108; Link, pro, 20,108
Indiana—
1884—Gray, d, 245,140; Calkins, r, 237,748; Leonard, gbk, 8,338
1888—Matson, d, 260,994; Hovey, r, 263,194; Templeton, peo, 22,017; Worth, pro, 12, 960
Iowa—
1887—Anderson, d, 153,526; Larrabee, r, 169,686; —, pro, 14,499
1889—Boies, d, 180,111; Hutchison, r, 173,588; Downing, u l, 5,579; Smith, pro, 1,353; Doty, gbk, 42
1891—Boies, d, 207,589; Wheeler, r, 199,373; Westfall, peo, 12,271; Gibson, pro, 919
Kansas—
1888—Martin, d, 107,480; Humphrey, r, 180,481; Elder, u l, 35,837; Botkin, pro, 6,439
1890—Robinson, d, 71,357; Humphrey, r, 115,025; Willits, peo, 106,972
1892—Lewelling, fusion, 163,507; Smith, r, 158,075; Pickering, pro, 4,178
Kentucky—
1883—Knott, d, 133,615; Morrow, r, 89,181
1887—Buckner, d, 143,270; Bradley, r, 126,473; Fox, Jr, pro, 8,394; Cardin, lab, 4,344
1891—Brown, d, 144,168; Wood, r, 116,087; Erwin, peo, 24,631; Harris, pro, 3,293
Louisiana—
1884—McEnery, d, 88,794; Stevenson, r, 43,501
1888—Nichols, d, 137,257; Warmouth, r, 51,471
1892—Foster (anti-lot dem), 79,388; McEnery, (lot dem), 47,037; Leonard (Reg Rep), 29,459; Breaux (custom-house rep), 12,359; Tannehill, peo, 9,792
Maine—
1888—Putnam, d, 61,350; Burleigh, r, 79,398; Cushing, pro, 3,122
1890—Thompson, d, 45,331; Burleigh, r, 64,214; Clark, pro, 2,981
1892—Johnson, d, 55,078; Cleaves, r, 67,609; Hussey, pro, 3,732; Bateman, peo, 3,005
Maryland—
1883—McLane, d, 92,694; Holton, r, 80,707
1887—Jackson, d, 99,038; Brooks, r, 86,633; Balwin, pro, 4,416
1891—Brown, d, 108,539; Vannort, r, 73,388; Higgins, pro, 5,120
Massachusetts—
1890—Russell, d, 140,507; Brackett, r, 131,454
1891—Russell, d, 157,982; Allen, r, 151,515; Kimball, pro, 8,968
1892—Russell, d, 186,377; Hale, r, 183,843; Hamlin, pro, 7,067; Winn, peo, 1,976; Putney, socialist, 871
Michigan—
1888—Burt, d, 216,450; Luce, r, 233,595; Cheney, pro, 20,342; Mills, u l, 4,388
1890—Winans, d, 183,725; Turner, r, 172,205; Patridge, pro, 28,651; Belden, indust, 13,198
1892—Morse, d, 205,138; Rich, r, 221,228; Russell, pro, 20,777; Ewing, peo, 21,417
Minnesota—
1888—Wilson, d, 110,251; Merriam, r, 134,355; Harrison, pro, 17,150; Paul, u l, 385
1890—Wilson, d, 85,844; Merriam, r, 88,111; Owen, f a, 58,514; Pinkham, pro, 8,424
1892—Lawler, d, 94,600; Nelson, r, 109,220; Dean, pro, 12,239; Donnelly, peo, 39,863
Mississippi—
1891—Lowry, d, 76,365; King, r, and gbk, 51,364
1885—Lowry, d, 88,783 (no opposition), scattering, 1,081
1889—Stone, d, 84,929 (no opposition)
Missouri—
1884—Marmaduke, d, 218,885; Ford, fusion, 207,939; Brooks, pro, 10,426
1888—Francis, d, 255,764; Kimball, r, 242,531; Manring, u l, 15,438; Lowe, pro, 4,389
1892—Stone, d, 965,044; Warner, r, 235,381; Leonard, peo, 37,262; Sobieski, pro, 3,933
Montana—
1889—Toole, d, 19,564; Powers, r, 18,988
1892—Collins, d, 17,650; Rickards, r, 18,187; Kennedy, peo, 7,794; Waters, pro, 543
Nebraska—
1888—McShane, d, 85,420; Thayer, r, 103,983; Butler, lab, 3,941; Biglow, pro, 9,511
1890—Boyd, d, 71,331; Richards, r, 68,878; Powers, ind, 70,187
1892—Morton, d, 44,195; Crounse, r, 78,426; Van Wyke, 68,617; Bentley, pro, 6,235
Nevada—
1882—Adams, d, 7,770; Strother, r, 6,535
1886—Adams, d, 5,862; Stevenson, r, 6,462
1890—Winters, d, 5,791; Colcord, r, 6,601
New Hampshire—
1888—Amsden, d, 44,093; Goodell, r, 44,809; Carr, pro, 1,567; scattering, 30
1890—Amsden, d, 42,386; Tuttle, r, 42,479; Fletcher, pro, 1,363
1892—McKinney, d, 41,501; Smith, r, 42,676; Carr, pro, 1,546
New Jersey—
1886—Green, d, 109,939; Howey, r, 101,919; Fisk, pro, 19,808
1889—Abbett, d, 138,245; Grubb, r, 123,992; LaMonte, pro, 6,853
1892—Werts, d, 167,257; Kean, r, 159,632, Kennedy, pro, 7,750
New York—
1885—Hill, d, 501,465; Davenport, r, 490,331; Jones, gbk, 2,130
1888—Hill, d, 650,464; Miller, r and u l, 631,293; Hall, soc, 3,348
1891—Flower, d, 582,893; Fassett, r, 534,956; Bruce, pro, 30,353; DeLeon, soc, 14,651
North Carolina—
1884—Scales, d, 143,239; ——, r, 123,010
1888—Fowle, d, 147,925; Dockery, r, 133,475
1892—Carr, d, 129,955; Furches, r, 90,174; Exum, peo, 45,592; Templeton, pro, 2,436
North Dakota—
1884—Roach, d, 12,733; Miller, r, 25,365
1892—Shortridge, fusion, 18,995; Burke, r, 17,236
Ohio—
1887—Powell, d, 333,205; Foraker, r, 356,534; Sharp, pro, 29,700; Seitz, lab, 24,711
1889—Campbell, d, 379,423; Foraker, r, 368,551; Helling, pro, 26,504; Rhodes, u l, 1,048
1891—Campbell, d, 365,228; McKinley, r, 386,739; Seitz, peo, 23,472; Ashendurst, pro, 20,190
Oregon—
1892—Smith, d, 20,029; Moody, r, 21,481
1886—Pennoyer, d, 27,901; Cornelius, r, 24,199; Houston, pro, 2,727
1890—Pennoyer, d, 38,919; Thompson, r, 33,786
Pennsylvania—
1882—Pattison, d, 355,791; Beaver, r, 315,589; Stewart, ind r, 43,743; Armstrong, gbk and lab, 23,996
Rhode Island—
1890—Davis, d, 20,548; Ladd, r, 18,988; Larry, pro, 1,820; Chace, u, 752
1891—Davis, d, 22,249; Ladd, r, 20,995; Lany, pro, 1,829; Burton, nat, 384
1892—Wardwell, d, 25,433; Brown, r, 27,461; Gilbert, pro, 1,598; Burton, nat, 187
South Carolina—
1888—Richardson, d, 58,730 (no opposition)
1890—Tillman, d, 59,159; Haskell, ind d, 14,828
1892—Tillman, d, 56,673 (no opposition)
South Dakota—
1889—McClure, d, 23,840; Mellett, r, 53,964
1890—Taylor, d, 18,484; Mellette, r, 34,487; Loucks, ind, 24,591
1892—Couchman, d, 14,46\72; Sheldon, r, 33,414; Van Osdel, peo, 22,524
Tennessee—
1888—Taylor, d, 156,799; Hawkins, r, 139,014; Johnson, pro, 6,893
1890—Buchanan, d, 113,549; Baxter, r, 76,081; Kelly, pro, 11,082
1892—Turney, d, 127,247; Winstead, r, 100,629; Buchanan, peo, 31,515; East, pro, 5,427
Texas—
1888—Ross, d, 250,338; Martin, r, 98,447
1890—Hogg, d, 262,432; Flanagan, r, 77,742
1892—Hogg, d, 190,486; Clark, ind d, 133,395; Nugent, peo, 108,483; Houston, r, 1,322; Burleson, pro, 1,605; scattering, 176
Vermont—
1888—Shurtleff, d, 19,527; Dillingham, r, 48,522; Seeley, pro, 1,372
1890—Brigham, d, 19,229; Page, r, 33,462; Allen, pro, 1,161; scattering, 304
1892—Smalley, d, 19,216; Fuller, r, 38,918; Allen, pro, 1,525; scattering, 221
Virginia—
1881—Cameron, d (readjuster), 111,473; Daniel, d, 99,757
1885—Lee, d, 152,544; Wise, r, 136,510
1889—McKinney, d, 162,654; Mahone, r, 120,477
2Washington—
1889—Semple, d, 24,723; Ferry, r, 33,711
1892—Snively, d, 28,779; McGraw, r, 33,103; Young, peo, 23,639; Green, pro, 3,823
West Virginia—
1884—
1888—
892—McCorkle, d, 84,584; Davis, r, 80,666; Bassell, peo, 4,037; Burt, pro, 2,039
Wisconsin—
1888—Morgan, d, 155,423; Hoard, r, 175,696; Durant, pro, 14,373; Powell, lab, 9,196
1890—Peck, d, 160,388; Hoard, r, 132,068; Alexander, pro, 1,246; May, lab, 5,446
1892—Peck, d, 178,095; Spooner, r, 170,497; Richmond, pro, 13,185; Butt, peo, 6,638
Wyoming—
1890—Baxter, d, 7,153; Warren, r, 8,879
1892—Osborne, d and peo, 9,290; Ivinson, r, 7,509; Brown, pro, 421